Peer Review Process & Timeline
Peer review is the backbone of trusted science. At JBRES, each manuscript is evaluated by qualified subject experts to verify scientific merit, methodology, ethical compliance, and clarity of presentation. Our goal is to help authors improve their work and publish high-quality research with strong global visibility through Gold Open Access.
What Reviewers Evaluate
Study design, methods, data interpretation, and validity of conclusions.
Originality, significance, and how the work advances the field.
Ethical approvals, patient consent (if applicable), and research integrity.
Structure, language, figures/tables, references, and overall readability.
Appropriate citations, background accuracy, and discussion depth.
Sufficient detail for replication and transparent reporting of results.
Typical Review Timeline
Timelines can vary based on the subject area and reviewer availability. Below is the standard workflow most manuscripts follow. If revisions are returned quickly, publication can proceed faster.
How We Support Authors
- Clear decision categories: Accept / Minor Revision / Major Revision / Reject with actionable guidance.
- Professional production: Formatting support, proof assistance, and structured article presentation.
- Permanent DOI & archiving: Citation-ready publication with stable links for long-term access.
- Communication: Editorial support team responds quickly to queries during review and production.
Ready to submit?
Submit your manuscript today and our editorial team will guide you through every step of the process.