Covid-19 Research

Open Access
Research Article

Batch Adsorption Studies of Sunset Yellow and Tartrazine Using Coconut and Groundnut Shells Google Scholar

Read • Cite • Share — permanent Open Access hosting with DOI tracking
Environmental Sciences
Environmental ImpactsEnvironmental ContaminationSoil Science

Volume1-Issue5
Dates: Received: 2020-09-07 | Accepted: 2020-09-16 | Published: 2020-09-23
Pages: 163-172

Abstract

This report was based on the comparative study on effectiveness of adsorption of food colors using coconuts and groundnut shell. The activated carbon (coconuts and groundnut shells) were cut into pieces in a furnace at a temperature of 450°C then crushed and sieved using different mesh sizes and activated using hydrochloric acid of different concentration. The food colors (sunset yellow and tartrazine) was prepared with different concentration and calibration curve was drawn, and the required measured concentration was contacted with varied masses of the adsorbent (coconuts and groundnut shell) for an equilibrium adsorption at room temperature on effect of time, pH, shaking speed, and temperature. The results on contact time on the pseudo-first and second using the test mechanism shows pseudo-first order model is more preferable than pseudo second order and the different effect result on the isotherm shows that Freundlich is best fitted for the adsorption process. Overall, groundnut shell showed higher adsorption for both sunset yellow and Tartrazine compared to coconut shell.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres1138


Certificate of Publication




Copyright

© 2020 Ademoriyo CO, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

How to cite this article

Ademoriyo CO, Enyoh CE. Batch Adsorption Studies of Sunset Yellow and Tartrazine Using Coconut and Groundnut Shells. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2020 Sep 23; 1(5): 163-172. doi: 10.37871/jbres1138, Article ID: jbres1138


Subject area(s)

Environmental Impacts
Environmental Contamination
Soil Science

References


  1. Alison D, Collins P. Colouring our foods in the last and next
  2. millennium. Int J of Food Sci and Tech. 2001 Dec;35:5-22. doi:
  3. 1046/j.1365-2621.2000.00373.x
  4. Meyer Z. Where’s the best place to hit the Heinz? 7 fun facts as
  5. ketchup maker turns 150 this year. 2019;USA Today.
  6. Meggos H.Food colours: An international perspective. The manufacturing
  7. nconfectioner. 1995;59-65.
  8. Barrows JN, Lipman AL, Bailey CJ. Color Additives: FDA’s Regulatory
  9. Process and Historical Perspectives. 2009; FDA.
  10. Apipreeya K, Phussadee P, Prasert P. Removal of metal ion from
  11. synthetic wasteWater by activated carbon from Eucalyptus CamaldulensiDehn Bark.
  12. The 2nd Joint International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment
  13. Ozcan AS, Erdem B, Ozcan A. Adsorption of Acid Blue 193 from aqueous
  14. solutions onto Na-bentonite and DTMA-bentonite. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004
  15. Dec 1;280(1):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.07.035. PMID: 15476772.
  16. Isiuku BO, Enyoh CE. Water pollution by heavy metal and organic pol­lutants:
  17. Brief review of sources, effects and progress on remediation with aquatic
  18. plants. Analytical Methods in Environmental Chemistry Journal. 2019;2(03):5-38.
  19. doi.org/10.24200/amecj.v3.i03.66
  20. Yulu O, Zabaniotou A. Agricultural precursors for activated carbon
  21. production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2007;11:1966-2005. doi:
  22. 1016/j.rser.2006.03.013
  23. Cabe Mc, Smith WL, Harriott P. Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering.
  24. 7th Edition. McGraw-Hill. 2006;836-844.
  25. Omonhenles S, Ofomaja A, Okiemen F. Adsorption of methylene blue by Unmodified and modified citric acid
  26. sawdust. Journal of Chemical Soc. of Nigeria. 2006;30:161-164
  27. & Preparation an evaluation of activated carbon from coconut shell and
  28. walnut shell. Chemical Journal. 2006;191-196.
  29. Rahman IA, Saad B, Shaidan S, Sya Rizal ES. Adsorption characteristics
  30. of malachite green on activated carbon derived from rice husks produced by
  31. chemical-thermal process. Bioresour Technol. 2005 Sep;96(14):1578-83. doi:
  32. 1016/j.biortech.2004.12.015. Epub 2005 Feb 16. PMID: 15978990.
  33. Halward T, Stalker T, LaRue E, Kochert G. Use of single-primer DNA
  34. amplifications in genetic studies of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Mol
  35. Biol. 1992 Jan;18(2):315-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00034958. PMID: 1731991.
  36. David RD. Walnut production manual. UCANR.ISBN 978-1-879906-27-3. 1997.
  37. Ekuma FK. Chukwuemeka-Okorie H.O, Okoyeagu A, Chimeziri CC. STUDIES ON
  38. THE ADSORPTION OF TARTRAZINE AND SUNSET YELLOW DYES FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTION USING
  39. ACTIVATED GBAFILO (Chrysobalanus icaco) SHELL. J Chem Soc.Nigeria.
  40. 2019;44:937-947.
  41. Pearsall Ed. Coconut Concise Oxford Dictionary (10th ed). Oxford:
  42. Clarendon Press. 1999.
  43. Udo EJ, Ogunwale A. Laboratory Manual for the Analysis of Soil, Plant
  44. and WaterSamples, second ed. university press limited, Ibadan, Nigeria. AOAC.
  45. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Official method of Analysis
  46. fourteen. Washington DC 1986.
  47. Diao Y, Walawender WP, Fan LT. Activated carbons prepared from
  48. phosphoric acid activation of grain sorghum. Bioresour Technol. 2002
  49. Jan;81(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00100-6. PMID: 11708755.
  50. Fatih D, Sengul K. Removal of Basic Red 46 dye from aqueous solution by
  51. pine tree leaves. Chem Eng J. 2011;170: 67-74. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.029
  52. Nasuha N, Hameed BH, Din AT. Rejected tea as a potential low-cost
  53. adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue. J Hazard Mater. 2010 Mar
  54. 15;175(1-3):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.138. Epub 2009 Oct 3. PMID:
  55. Abdel NA, Hendawy EL. Surface and adsorptive properties of carbons
  56. prepared from biomass. Appl Surf Sci. 2005 Oct; 252(02): 287-295. doi:
  57. 1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.092
  58. Sadaa BH, Amarteyb YD, Bakoc S. An Investigation into The Use Of
  59. Groundnut Shell As Fine Aggregate Replacement. Nigerian Journal of Technology.
  60. 2013; 32.
  61. Nadavala SK, Mohammad A, Anesh MP, Madala S, Mansour IAH. Equilibrium
  62. and Kinetic Studies of Biosorptive Removal of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol from
  63. Aqueous Solutions Using Untreated Agro-Waste Pine Cone Biomass. Process. 2019;
  64. 7(10):1-17. doi: 10.3390/pr7100757
  65. Asiagwu AK, Emoyan OO, Ojebah CK. Removal of Tartrazine Yellow Dye From
  66. Aqueous Solution using Groundnut Shell as Biomass: Kinetic Approach.
  67. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology. 2018 May;
  68. 7(05).
  69. Enyoh CE, Isiuku BO. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCP) Removal from Aqueous
  70. Solution using Canna indica L: Kinetic Isotherm and Thermodynamic Studies.
  71. Chemistry and Ecology. 2020 June; doi: 10.1080/02757540.2020.1821673
  72. Lima DR, Lima EC, Umpierres CS, Thue PS, El-Chaghaby GA, da Silva RS,
  73. Pavan FA, Dias SLP, Biron C. Removal of amoxicillin from simulated hospital
  74. effluents by adsorption using activated carbons prepared from capsules of
  75. cashew of Para. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(16):16396-16408. doi:
  76. 1007/s11356-019-04994-6. Epub 2019 Apr 13. PMID: 30982189.
  77. Zichao L, Hassan H, Lei Z, Lotfi S, Matias SN, Marcos LO, Moaaz KS,
  78. Guilherme LD, Adrian BP, Qun L. Adsorption of congo red and methylene blue dyes
  79. on an ashitaba waste and a walnut shell-based activated carbon from aqueous
  80. solutions: Experiments, characterization and physical interpretations. Chemical
  81. Engineering Journal, 2020 May; 124263. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124263
  82. Dai Y, Zhang N, Xing C, Cui Q, Sun Q. The adsorption, regeneration and
  83. engineering applications of biochar for removal organic pollutants: A review.
  84. Chemosphere. 2019 May;223:12-27. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.161. Epub
  85. 2019 Feb 5. PMID: 30763912.
  86. Nobukane H, Yanagihara K, Kunisada Y, Ogasawara Y, Isono K, Nomura K,
  87. Tanahashi K, Nomura T, Akiyama T, Tanda S. Co-appearance of superconductivity
  88. and ferromagnetism in a Ca2RuO4 nanofilm crystal. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb
  89. 26;10(1):3462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60313-x. PMID: 32103095; PMCID:
  90. PMC7044234.

Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable