Covid-19 Research

Opinion

Enhanced Genome Editing Needs an AI-Powered Meta-Platform for Smarter TALEN and CRISPR Tool Selection

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Opinion
Subject Biology Group
OCLC JBRES Record
Yufeng Liu, Muhammad Zawwad Raza and Muhammad Riaz
Issue: Volume7-Issue4
Pages: 1-6
Received: 2026-03-31
Accepted: 2026-04-05
Published: 2026-04-06

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping genome-editing design, supporting predictive modeling of TALEN- and CRISPR-based systems by integrating genomic sequence features, chromatin structural context, and experimental metadata. However, the rapid proliferation of machine learning (ML)-driven tools has created a fragmented landscape in which different models operate on distinct, incompatible scoring scales and rely on heterogeneous training datasets, thereby substantially limiting the systematic, reproducible benchmarking of these tools. It produces a clear unmet need for harmonization in this space. To address this gap, we propose an AI-driven meta-platform that integrates predictions from existing genome-editing design tools using a stacked ensemble learning strategy and meta-modeling. The framework harmonizes diverse datasets and incorporates continuously filtered feedback from experimentally validated editing outcomes, with appropriate safeguards to manage the challenges inherent to multi-source, community-contributed experimental data. Through this process, the system learns the context-dependent strengths and limitations of individual predictors across different cell types, delivery modalities, and nuclease variants. By doing so, it enables tool-agnostic benchmarking, mitigates model-specific biases, and provides confidence-aware prioritization of candidate guides. We argue that such a unifying platform can shift the field from isolated, model-specific predictions towards an integrated, knowledge-driven ecosystem. This is expected to enhance robustness, interpretability, and reproducibility while supporting responsible data governance through explainable AI and privacy-preserving learning.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres2289 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2026 Liu Y et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

Liu Y, Riaz M. Enhanced Genome Editing Needs an AI-Powered Meta-Platform for Smarter TALEN and CRISPR Tool Selection. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2026 Apr 06; 7(4): 6. Doi: 10.37872/jbres2289

Subject area(s)

BioinformaticsBioengineeringBiotechnology

References

  1. Dixit S, Kumar A, Srinivasan K, Vincent P, Krishnan NR. Advancing genome editing with artificial intelligence: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1335901.
  2. Mitra R, Li J, Sagendorf JM, Jiang Y, Cohen AS, Chiu TP, Glasscock CJ, Rohs R. Geometric deep learning of protein-DNA binding specificity. Nat Methods. 2024;21(9):1674-83.
  3. Chuai G, Ma H, Yan J, Chen M, Hong N, Xue D, Zhou C, Zhu C, Chen K, Duan B, et al. DeepCRISPR: optimized CRISPR guide RNA design by deep learning. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):80.
  4. Yan J, Chuai G, Zhou C, Zhu C, Yang J, Zhang C, Gu F, Xu H, Wei J, Liu Q. Benchmarking CRISPR on-target sgRNA design. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(4):721-4.
  5. Kim HK, Kim Y, Lee S, Min S, Bae JY, Choi JW, Park J, Jung D, Yoon S, Kim HH. SpCas9 activity prediction by DeepSpCas9, a deep learning-based model with high generalization performance. Sci Adv. 2019;5(11):eaax9249.
  6. Zhang G, Luo Y, Dai X, Dai Z. Benchmarking deep learning methods for predicting CRISPR/Cas9 sgRNA on- and off-target activities. Brief Bioinform. 2023;24(6):bbad460.
  7. Farooq MA, Gao S, Hassan MA, Huang Z, Rasheed A, Hearne S, Prasanna B, Li X, Li H. Artificial intelligence in plant breeding. Trends Genet. 2024;40(10):891-908.
  8. Kim MG, Go MJ, Kang SH, Jeong SH, Lim K. Revolutionizing CRISPR technology with artificial intelligence. Exp Mol Med. 2025;57(7):1419-31.
  9. Haeussler M, Schönig K, Eckert H, Eschstruth A, Mianne J, Renaud JB, Schneider-Maunoury S, Shkumatava A, Teboul L, Kent J, et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):148.
  10. Ma M, Ye AY, Zheng W, Kong L. A guide RNA sequence design platform for the CRISPR/Cas9 system for model organism genomes. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:270805.
  11. Zhang P, Cao W, Obradovic Z. Learning by aggregating experts and filtering novices: a solution to crowdsourcing problems in bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14 Suppl 12:S5.
  12. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, Li B, Madabhushi A, Shah P, Spitzer M, et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(6):463-77.
  13. Karimi MA, Paryan M, Fard GB, Sadeghian H, Zarrinfar H, Bafghi MH. Challenges and opportunities in the application of CRISPR-Cas9: a review on genomic editing and therapeutic potentials. Med Princ Pract. 2025;34(2):103-117.
  14. Kamens J. The Addgene repository: an international nonprofit plasmid and data resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D1152-7.
  15. Gooden AA, Evans CN, Sheets TP, Clapp ME, Chari R. dbGuide: a database of functionally validated guide RNAs for genome editing in human and mouse cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D871-6.
  16. Rauscher B, Heigwer F, Breinig M, Winter J, Boutros M. GenomeCRISPR—a database for high-throughput CRISPR/Cas9 screens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D679-84.
  17. Rahmat ZS, Ali MH, Talha M, Hasibuzzaman MA. FDA approval of Casgevy and Lyfgenia: a dual breakthrough in gene therapies for sickle cell disease. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024;86(9):4966-8.
  18. Kim S, Chu SH, Park YJ, Lee CY. Stacked generalization as a computational method for genomic selection. Front Genet. 2024;15:1401470.
  19. Naimi AI, Balzer LB. Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(5):459-64.
  20. Liang M, Chang T, An B, Duan X, Du L, Wang X, Miao J, Xu L, Gao X, Zhang L, et al. A stacking ensemble learning framework for genomic prediction. Front Genet. 2021;12:600040.
  21. Calvino G, Peconi C, Strafella C, Trastulli G, Megalizzi D, Andreucci S, Cascella R, Caltagirone C, Zampatti S, Giardina E. Federated learning: breaking down barriers in global genomic research. Genes (Basel). 2024;15(12):1573.
  22. Sharma S, Guleria K. A comprehensive review on federated learning based models for healthcare applications. Artif Intell Med. 2023;146:102691.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership