Covid-19 Research

Research Article

Linking Forest Ecological Status to Wild Food Availability: A Quantitative Assessment

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Research Article
Subject Environmental Sciences
OCLC JBRES Record
Debal Deb
Issue: Volume6-Issue10
Pages: 1544-1563
Received: 2025-10-14
Accepted: 2025-10-22
Published: 2025-10-23

Abstract

Forests have always been an integral part of the livelihood of indigenous “Forest People” living in settlements in and around forests. The economic value of non-timber forest products is primarily comprised by wild food items, which constitute a substantial portion of the annual diet spectrum of the forest villagers. During the lean period of agricultural production, as well as in times of climate-induced uncertainties of food, harvest of wild food biota from the forest is a traditional measure of food security in the indigenous societies in much of global South. There is ample body of literature documenting the flow of wild food biomass into indigenous households of forest fringe villages in South and Southeast Asia, and it is common ecological understanding that the diversity, abundance, and availability of wild food depend on the forest ecological status. However, there is paucity of empirical studies to understand the association of forest floral species diversity, abundance and stand structure with the wild food biota diversity and biomass. This paper attempts to a primary quantitative assessment of wild food biomass flow into villages from different types of forests under two different categories of management, namely, centralized “Command and Control” style forest management by state Forest Department (FD), vis-à-vis decentralized Informal Community Management (ICM), examined in two districts of Odisha, India. This study reveals for the first time a set of significant linkages between forest stand ecological characters and wild food diversity and biomass in the forests. This study also reveals that aside from the forest ecological status, shaped largely by the management regime, ethnic food cultural preferences for diverse edible biota also determined the quantity of the food biomass harvest.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres2209 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2025 Deb D. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

Deb D. Linking Forest Ecological Status to Wild Food Availability: A Quantitative Assessment. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2025 Oct 23; 6(10): 1544-1563. doi: 10.37871/jbres2209, Article ID: JBRES2209, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres2209.pdf

Subject area(s)

Natural Resource ManagementEcosystem Science

References

  1. Global biodiversity assessment. United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
  2. Palik, B, Bengstrom T. Species composition. In: Hunter ML, editor. Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999. p. 65-94.
  3. Flint EP. Deforestation and land use in northern India with a focus on sal (Shorea robusta) forests 1880-1980. In: Grove R, Damodaran V, Sangwan S, editors. Nature and the orient. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 421-458.
  4. Sivaramakrishnan K. Modern forests: Statemaking and environmental change in colonial eastern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 1999.
  5. Deb D. The value of forest: An ecological economic examination of forest people’s perspective, In: Trevor Fenning, editor. Challenges and opportunities for the world’s forests in the 21st Century. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. p. 123-159.
  6. Gadgil M, Guha R. Ecology and Equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. London: Routledge; 1995.
  7. Kothari A, Camill P, Brown J. Conservation as if people also mattered: Policy and practice of community-based conservation. Conservation and Society. 2013;11:1-15.
  8. Letter to principal secretary (Forests). Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. 2021.
  9. The Wire. 94,460 trees felled in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo forest, 2,73,757 more to go, Government tells Parliament. The Wire. 2025.
  10. PTI. Chhattisgarh forest department recommends approval of forest land for coal mining project. Press Trust of India. 2025.
  11. Deb D. Joint forest management. In: Ghosh AK, editor. Status of Environment in West Bengal: a Citizens’ Report. Kolkata: ENDEV Society for Environment and Development; 2008. p. 96-104.
  12. Shackleton C M, Pandey AK. Positioning non-timber forest products on the development agenda. Forest Policy and Economics. 2014;38:1-7.
  13. Sardeshpande M, Shackleton C. Wild edible fruits: A systematic review of an under-researched multifunctional NTFP (Non-Timber Forest Product). Forests. 2019;10:467.
  14. Kapoor R, Sabharwal M, Ghosh-Jerath S. Indigenous Foods of India: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Nutritive Values, Antinutrient Content and Mineral Bioavailability of Traditional Foods Consumed by Indigenous Communities of India. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2022 Apr 28;6:696228. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.696228. PMID: 35607508; PMCID: PMC7612755.
  15. Cheek JZ, Lambrecht NJ, den Braber B, Akanchha N, Govindarajulu D, Jones AD, Chhatre A, Rasmussen LV. Wild foods contribute to women's higher dietary diversity in India. Nat Food. 2023 Jun;4(6):476-482. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00766-1. Epub 2023 Jun 22. PMID: 37349564.
  16. Ong HG, Kim YD. The role of wild edible plants in household food security among transitioning hunter-gatherers: Evidence from the Philippines. Food Secur. 2017;9:11-24.
  17. Chauhan SH, Yadav S, Takahashi T, Łuczaj Ł, D'Cruz L, Okada K. Consumption patterns of wild edibles by the Vasavas: a case study from Gujarat, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Aug 29;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13002-018-0254-3. PMID: 30157859; PMCID: PMC6116503.
  18. Singh RK, Bhardwaj R, Singh A, Payum T, Rai AK, Singh A, Wangchu L, Upadhyay S. Mainstreaming Local Food Species for Nutritional and Livelihood Security: Insights From Traditional Food Systems of Adi Community of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Front Nutr. 2021 Aug 16;8:590978. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.590978. PMID: 34485354; PMCID: PMC8415219.
  19. Pieroni A, Hovsepyan R, Manduzai AK, Soukand R. Wild food plants traditionally gathered in central Armenia: archaic ingredients or future sustainable foods? Environ Dev Sustain. 2020;3:2358-2381.
  20. Nagashree G, Kotresha K. Checklist on wild edible fruits from forest areas of Tumkur district, Karnataka, India. J Plant Sci Res. 2024;11:258
  21. Ghanimi R, Ouhammou A, Ahouach A, Cherkaoui M. Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants traditionally used by Messiwa people, Morocco. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022 Mar 15;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00500-4. PMID: 35292058; PMCID: PMC8922891.
  22. Yangdon P, Araki T, Rahayu YYS, Norbu K. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible fruits in eastern Bhutan. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2022 Mar 30;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00526-8. PMID: 35354474; PMCID: PMC8966357.
  23. Challe JF, Niehof A, Struik PC. The significance of gathering wild orchid tubers for orphan household livelihoods in a context of HIV/AIDS in Tanzania. Afr J AIDS Res. 2011 Sep;10(3):207-18. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2011.626287. PMID: 25859789.
  24. Ahmed MA. Contribution of non-timber forest products to household food security: The case of Yabelo Woreda, Borana Zone, Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management. 2013;20.
  25. Bwalya SM. Household dependence on forest income in rural Zambia. Zambia Soc Sci J. 2013;2:6.
  26. Vira B, Wildburger C, Mansourian S. Forests and food. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers; 2015.
  27. Blaikie P, Springate BO. Understanding the policy process. In: Baginski OS, Blaikie P, editors. Forest, People and Power: The political ecology of reform in South Asia. London: Earthscan; 2007. p. 61-91.
  28. Ickowitz A, Powell B, Salim MA, Sunderland TCH. Dietary quality and tree cover in Africa. Global Environmental Change. 2014;24:287-294.
  29. Van NM, Bizard V, Wangpakapattanawong P. Tree cover transitions and food security in Southeast Asia. Global Food Security. 2014;3:200-208.
  30. Kleinschmit D, Basnett BS, Martin A. Drivers of forests and tree-based systems for food Security and nutrition. In: Vira B, Christoph W, Stephanie M, editors. Forests and Food. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers; 2015. p. 137-182.
  31. Champion HG, Seth SK. A revised survey of forest types of India. New Delhi: Govt. of India: Press; 1968. p. 404.
  32. West PW. Tree and forest measurement. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2009.
  33. Soberón JM, Llorente JB. The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conservation Biology. 1993;7:480-488.
  34. Magurran AE. Measuring biological diversity. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell; 2004.
  35. Georgiev GZ. Normality calculator; 2023.
  36. Gibbons JD, Chakraborti S. Nonparametric statistical inference. 6th ed. London: CRC Press; 2021.
  37. Puig CG, Reigosa MJ, Valentão P, Andrade PB, Pedrol N. Unravelling the bioherbicide potential of Eucalyptus globulus Labill: Biochemistry and effects of its aqueous extract. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0192872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192872. PMID: 29438430; PMCID: PMC5811039.
  38. Liu B, Qu Z, Ma Y, Xu J, Chen P, Sun H. Eucalyptus Plantation Age and Species Govern Soil Fungal Community Structure and Function Under a Tropical Monsoon Climate in China. Front Fungal Biol. 2021 Sep 10;2:703467. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2021.703467. PMID: 37744134; PMCID: PMC10512287.
  39. Harriss WB. The intra-family distribution of hunger in South Asia. In: Dreze J, Sen A, editors. The Political Economy of Hunger. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1991.
  40. Mahadevan R, Suardi S. Is there a role for caste and religion in food security policy? A look at rural India. Economic Modelling. 2013;31:58-69.
  41. Subramanian S, Deaton A. Gender effects in Indian food consumption patterns, Research Programme in Development studies, Discussion Paper 147, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 1990.
  42. Gupta A, Mishra DK. Food consumption pattern in rural India: a regional perspective. J Econ Soc Dev. 2014;9:1-16.
  43. Meenakshi JV, Ray R. Regional differences in India’s food expenditure pattern: a complete demand systems approach. J Intern Dev. 1999;11:47-74.
  44. Baddianaah I, Baaweh L. The prospects of community-based natural resource management in Ghana: A case study of Zukpiri community resource management area. Heliyon. 2021 Oct 15;7(10):e08187. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08187. PMID: 34712859; PMCID: PMC8529512.
  45. Deb D, Malhotra KC. People’s participation: The evolution of joint forest management in West Bengal. In: Roy SB, Ghosh A, editors. People of India: The biocultural dimensions. New Delhi: Inter-India Publication; 1993. p. 329-342.
  46. Conroy C, Mishra A, Rani A. Learning from self-initiated community forest management in Orissa, India. For Policy Econ. 2002;4:227-237.
  47. Patnaik S. Sulia paribesh parishad: Guardians of the forest. In: Durst PB, Brown C, Tacio HD, Ishikawa M, editors. In search of excellence: Exemplary forest management in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific; 2015. p. 61-71.
  48. Durst PB, Brown C, Taco HD. In search of excellence: Exemplary forest management in Asia and the Pacific. Asia-pacific forestry commission. Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations; 2015.
  49. Nayak PK, Berkes F. Politics of co-optation: community forest management versus Joint Forest Management in Orissa, India. Environ Manage. 2008 May;41(5):707-18. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9088-4. PMID: 18288518.
  50. Banerjee AK, Ghosh AS, Springate BO. Obstructed access to forest justice in West Bengal: State violations in the mis-implementation of the Forest Rights Act 2006. IPPG discussion paper #49. Improving Institutions for Pro-Poor Growth Research Programme, Manchester, UK; 2010.
  51. Douthwaite R. The growth illusion. 2nd ed. Dublin: Lilliput Press; 1999.
  52. Deb D. Beyond developmentality: Constructing inclusive freedom and sustainability. London: Earthscan/ Routledge; 2009.
  53. Mukhopadhayay R. Biodiversity conservation through participatory monitoring: A case study from People’s protected area Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. J Biodivers. 2012;3:45-53.
  54. Ball AA, Brancalion PH. Governance challenges for commercial exploitation of a non-timber forest product by marginalized rural communities. Environ Conserv. 2016;43:208-220.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership