Covid-19 Research

Review Article

OCLC Number/Unique Identifier:

Metadata and Sentiment Data Analytics on Social Media Tweets

General Science    Start Submission

Alice S Etim*

Volume6-Issue7
Dates: Received: 2025-06-21 | Accepted: 2025-07-15 | Published: 2025-07-16
Pages: 884-890

Abstract

The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 led to decisions by both the federal and state governments in the United States of America (hereafter, governments) to implement policies about staying at home to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus. With the closure of many businesses, people worked from home and schools moved face-to-face classes to online or remote learning. People were concerned about the policies and the impact of such policies on their livelihood. Social media websites such as Twitter (X) were used to voice opinions about the challenges posed by the stay-at-home orders. People expressed positive and negative sentiments about the closures and reopening of offices, schools, restaurants, and other public places as well as the impact of the government stay-at-home policies. This article examines both the positive and negative sentiments expressed using the tweets from the Twitter (X) platform. The metadata and sentimental data collected via the social media site, Twitter (X) for three states – North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and California on the pandemic, stay-at-home and reopening policies were analyzed and discussed. The study adds value to existing literature about COVID-19 in understanding people’s opinions, better information sharing by governments, scientists and others that influence policy decisions in cases of future public health crisis.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres2143


Certificate of Publication




Copyright

© 2025 Etim AS, Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

How to cite this article

Etim AS. Metadata and Sentiment Data Analytics on Social Media Tweets. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2025 Jul 16; 6(7): 884-890. doi: 10.37871/jbres2143, Article ID: JBRES2143, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/ jbres2143.pdf


Subject area(s)

References


  1. Delorey TM, Ziegler CGK, Heimberg G, Normand R, Yang Y, Segerstolpe Å, Abbondanza D, Fleming SJ, Subramanian A, Montoro DT, Jagadeesh KA, Dey KK, Sen P, Slyper M, Pita-Juárez YH, Phillips D, Biermann J, Bloom-Ackermann Z, Barkas N, Ganna A, Gomez J, Melms JC, Katsyv I, Normandin E, Naderi P, Popov YV, Raju SS, Niezen S, Tsai LT, Siddle KJ, Sud M, Tran VM, Vellarikkal SK, Wang Y, Amir-Zilberstein L, Atri DS, Beechem J, Brook OR, Chen J, Divakar P, Dorceus P, Engreitz JM, Essene A, Fitzgerald DM, Fropf R, Gazal S, Gould J, Grzyb J, Harvey T, Hecht J, Hether T, Jané-Valbuena J, Leney-Greene M, Ma H, McCabe C, McLoughlin DE, Miller EM, Muus C, Niemi M, Padera R, Pan L, Pant D, Pe'er C, Pfiffner-Borges J, Pinto CJ, Plaisted J, Reeves J, Ross M, Rudy M, Rueckert EH, Siciliano M, Sturm A, Todres E, Waghray A, Warren S, Zhang S, Zollinger DR, Cosimi L, Gupta RM, Hacohen N, Hibshoosh H, Hide W, Price AL, Rajagopal J, Tata PR, Riedel S, Szabo G, Tickle TL, Ellinor PT, Hung D, Sabeti PC, Novak R, Rogers R, Ingber DE, Jiang ZG, Juric D, Babadi M, Farhi SL, Izar B, Stone JR, Vlachos IS, Solomon IH, Ashenberg O, Porter CBM, Li B, Shalek AK, Villani AC, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A. COVID-19 tissue atlases reveal SARS-CoV-2 pathology and cellular targets. Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7865):107-113. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03570-8. Epub 2021 Apr 29. PMID: 33915569; PMCID: PMC8919505.
  2. Etim A, Yarber L. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Analyzing risk factors impacting minority populations’ acceptance/adoption and ICT-based solutions. In: Etim A, editor. Adoption and use of technology tools and services by economically disadvantaged communities: Implications for Growth and Sustainability. IGI Global; 2024.
  3. US coronavirus vaccine tracker. USAFacts.
  4. Charumilind S, Craven M, Lamb J, Singhai S, Wilson M. Pandemic to endemic: How the world can learn to live with COVID-19. McKinsey & Company. 2021.
  5. Chou WS, Budenz A. Considering Emotion in COVID-19 Vaccine Communication: Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy and Fostering Vaccine Confidence. Health Commun. 2020 Dec;35(14):1718-1722. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1838096. Epub 2020 Oct 30. PMID: 33124475.
  6. Cowan SK, Mark N, Reich JA. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is the new terrain for political division among americans. Socinus: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. 2021;7:237802312110236. doi: 10.1177/23780231211023657.
  7. Bansal A, Gupta C, Muralidhar A. A sentimental analysis for youtube data using supervised learning approach. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT). 2019.
  8. Kates J, Orgera K. The red/blue divide in COVID-19 vaccination rates. KFF. 2021.
  9. Habib MA, Anik MAH. Impacts of COVID-19 on Transport Modes and Mobility Behavior: Analysis of Public Discourse in Twitter. Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):65-78. doi: 10.1177/03611981211029926. Epub 2021 Aug 10. PMID: 37153163; PMCID: PMC10149523.
  10. Airak S, Sukor NSA, Rahman NA. Travel behaviour changes and risk perception during COVID-19: A case study of Malaysia. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2023 Mar;18:100784. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100784.
  11. Chintalapudi N, Battineni G, Amenta F. Sentimental Analysis of COVID-19 Tweets Using Deep Learning Models. Infect Dis Rep. 2021 Apr 1;13(2):329-339. doi: 10.3390/idr13020032. PMID: 33916139; PMCID: PMC8167749.
  12. Biermann K, Taddicken M. Visible scientists in digital communication environments: An analysis of their role performance as public experts on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Underst Sci. 2024 May 21;34(1):9636625241249389. doi: 10.1177/09636625241249389. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38771041; PMCID: PMC11673311.
  13. Xing Y, He Y, Zhang Z. Examining themes of social media users’ opinion on remote work during COVID-19 pandemic: A justice theory perspective. Library Hi Tech. 2023;43(1):249-273.


Comments


Swift, Reliable, and studious. We aim to cherish the world by publishing precise knowledge.

  • Brown University Library
  • University of Glasgow Library
  • University of Pennsylvania, Penn Library
  • University of Amsterdam Library
  • The University of British Columbia Library
  • UC Berkeley’s Library
  • MIT Libraries
  • Kings College London University
  • University of Texas Libraries
  • UNSW Sidney Library
  • The University of Hong Kong Libraries
  • UC Santa Barbara Library
  • University of Toronto Libraries
  • University of Oxford Library
  • Australian National University
  • ScienceOpen
  • UIC Library
  • KAUST University Library
  • Cardiff University Library
  • Ball State University Library
  • Duke University Library
  • Rutgers University Library
  • Air University Library
  • UNT University of North Texas
  • Washington Research Library Consortium
  • Penn State University Library
  • Georgetown Library
  • Princeton University Library
  • Science Gate
  • Internet Archive
  • WashingTon State University Library
  • Dimensions
  • Zenodo
  • OpenAire
  • Index Copernicus International
  • icmje
  •  International Scientific Indexing (ISI)
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • ResearchGate
  • Universidad De Lima
  • WorldCat
  • JCU Discovery
  • McGill
  • National University of Singepore Libraries
  • SearchIT
  • Scilit
  • SemantiScholar
  • Base Search
  • VU
  • KB
  • Publons
  • oaji
  • Harvard University
  • sjsu-library
  • UWLSearch
  • Florida Institute of Technology
  • CrossRef
  • LUBsearch
  • Universitat de Paris
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • ResearchBIB
  • Google Scholar
  • Microsoft Academic Search