Wang S* and Xia Z
Volume5-Issue5
Dates: Received: 2024-05-06 | Accepted: 2024-05-23 | Published: 2024-05-28
Pages: 488-495
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence Ethics is playing an important role with the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI). It is popular recognized that obeying to Artificial Intelligence Ethics guidelines and principles may resolve so many problems caused by Artificial Intelligence. This paper reviewed the development history of Artificial Intelligence Ethics, listed the main guidelines and principles of Artificial Intelligence Ethics, proposed the methods of Artificial Intelligence Ethics governance, discussed related algorithms to solve Artificial Intelligence Ethics problems.
FullText HTML
FullText PDF
DOI: 10.37871/jbres1918
Certificate of Publication
Copyright
© 2024 Wang S, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 
How to cite this article
Wang S, Xia Z. Development Trends of Artifi cial Intelligence Ethics. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2024 May 28; 5(5): 488-495. doi: 10.37871/jbres1918, Article ID: JBRES1918, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1918.pdf
Subject area(s)
References
- Medin DL.Structural principles in categorization. In: Perception, Cognition and Development: Interaction Analyses. Tighe TJ, Shepp BE, Hillsdale NJ, editors. Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983. p.1469.
- Shanker S. Wittgenstein's remarks on the foundations of AI. London & New York: Routlege; 1998. p.187.
- Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics 8th ed. Oxford. Oxford University Press; 2012.
- Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Ineffectiveness and unlikelihood of benefit: dealing with the concept of futility in medicine. Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Dec 22;151:w30121. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.w30121. PMID: 34964591.
- Biller-Andorno N, Ferrario A, Joebges S, Krones T, Massini F, Barth P, Arampatzis G, Krauthammer M. AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care. J Med Ethics. 2022 Mar;48(3):175-183. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106786. Epub 2021 Mar 9. PMID: 33687916.
- Biller-Andorno N, Biller A. Algorithm-Aided Prediction of Patient Preferences - An Ethics Sneak Peek. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1480-1485. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1904869. PMID: 31597026.
- Giubilini A, Savulescu J. The artificial moral advisor. The “ideal observer” meets artificial intelligence. Philosophy & technology.2018;31 (2):169-188. doi: 10.1007/s13347-017-0285-z.
- Hermann H, Feuz M, Trachsel M, Biller-Andorno N. Decision-making capacity: from testing to evaluation. Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Jun;23(2):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09930-6. PMID: 32350707.
- Loi M, Ferrario A, Viganò E. Transparency as design publicity: Explaining and justifying inscrutable algorithms. Ethics and Information Technology. 2021;23(3):253-263. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09564-w.
- Meier LJ, Hein A, Diepold K, Buyx A. Algorithms for Ethical Decision-Making in the Clinic: A Proof of Concept. Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jul;22(7):4-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2040647. Epub 2022 Mar 16. PMID: 35293841.
- van de Poel I. Embedding values in artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Minds and Machines. 2020;30(3):385-409. doi: 10.1007/s11023-020-09537-4.
- Shaw D, Trachsel M, Elger B. Assessment of decision-making capacity in patients requesting assisted suicide. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;213(1):393-395. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.81. PMID: 29947315.
- den Hartogh G. Do we need a threshold conception of competence? Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 2016;19(1):71-83.
- Hermann H, Trachsel M, Biller-Andorno N. Physicians' personal values in determining medical decision-making capacity: a survey study. J Med Ethics. 2015 Sep;41(9):739-44. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102263. Epub 2015 Mar 17. PMID: 25784707.
