Covid-19 Research

Research Article

Valuing the Relative Importance of Goat Farmers Trait Preferences: Implication for Designing Community Based Breeding Program

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Research Article
Subject Biology Group
OCLC JBRES Record
Kefelegn Kebede* and Ahmed Usman
Issue: Volume4-Issue10
Pages: 1383-1393
Received: 2023-09-27
Accepted: 2023-10-10
Published: 2023-10-11

Abstract

The success of a breed improvement programme depends on farmers' participation in the identification of breeding objective traits relevant to particular production environments. This study compared and contrasted two methodological approaches weighted rank vs. exploded logit modelin an effort to better understand and value the relative importance of farmers' trait preferences. For this purpose, two districts (Erer and Shinnile), were selected purposively based on their agro-ecologies, goat population size, the relative significance of goats to the livelihood of the communities, and the willingness of the farmers to participate. A survey with 120 farmers (60 from each district) owning goat flocks was carried out to investigate the purpose of keeping goats, breeding buck and doe selection criteria, and goat production constraints. The results found for the purpose of keeping goats, breeding buck and doe selection criteria, and goat production constraints reflected the multiple objectives of the farmers. Milk, income and meat were the most important traits for the purpose of keeping goats; body conformation, fast growth and pedigree were the most important traits for the selection of bucks; milk yield, body conformation and mothering ability were the most important traits for the selection of does; and drought, disease and feed were the most important traits of production constraints in the study areas. The results of this study form the basis for better designing of breeding programs for sustainable utilisation that address farmers’ preferences, speed up genetic progress and conserve indigenous goats, thereby meeting the needs of farmers.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres1808 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2023 Kebede K, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

Kebede K, Usman A. Valuing the Relative Importance of Goat Farmers’ Trait Preferences: Implication for Designing Community Based Breeding Program. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2023 Oct 11; 4(10): 1383-1393. doi: 10.37871/jbres1808, Article ID: JBRES1808, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1808.pdf

Subject area(s)

Veterinary Science

References

  1. Kosgey IS, Baker RL, Udo HMJ, van Arendonk JAM. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programs in the tropics: A review. Small Rumin Res. 2006;61:13-28. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.01.003.
  2. Baker RL, GD Gray. Appropriate breeds and breeding schemes for sheep and goats in the tropics. In: Sani RA, Gray GD, Baker RL, editors. Worm Control for Small Ruminants in Tropical Asia. Monograph. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR); 2004. p.63-95.
  3. Sölkner J, Grausgruber H, Okeyo AM, Ruckenbauer P, Wurzinger M. Breeding objectives and the relative importance of traits in plant and animal breeding: A comparative review. Euphytica. 2008;161:273-282. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9507-2.
  4. Ndumu DB, Baumung R, Wurzinger M, Drucker AG, Okeyo AM, Semambo D, Sölkner J. Performance and fitness traits versus phenotypic appearance in the African Ankole Longhorn cattle: A novel approach to identify selection criteria for indigenous breeds. Livestock Science. 2008;113:234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.04.004.
  5. Haile A, Wurzinger M, Mueller J, Mirkena T, Duguma G, Mwai O. Guidelines for setting up community-based sheep breeding programs in Ethiopia. ICARDA tools and guidelines. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. 2011.
  6. Anderson S. Animal genetic resources and sustainable livelihoods. Ecological economics. 2003;45(3):331-339. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00088-0.
  7. Mekonnen H, Tadesse G. Goat production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: A review. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research. 2016;4(2):277-283.
  8. Gowane GR, Kumar D. Community-based sheep breeding programs for genetic improvement in developing countries: A review. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2016;86(5):505-509.
  9. Tadesse E, Getachew T. Community-based sheep breeding programs in developing countries: A review. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2019;7(3)83-87.
  10. Wurzinger M, Sölkner J, Iñiguez L. Important aspects and limitations in considering community-based breeding programs for low-input smallholder livestock systems. Small Ruminant Research. 2011;98:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.03.035.
  11. Gebreyesus G, Aynalem H, Tadelle D. Breeding scheme based on community-based participatory analysis of local breeding practices, objectives and constraints for goats around Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2013;25(3).
  12. Haile A, Mirkena T, Duguma G, Wurzinger M, Rischkowsky B, Tibbo M, Mwai AO, Sölkner J. Community-based sheep breeding programs: Tapping into indigenous knowledge. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 2013;25(12). doi: 20.500.11766/7250.
  13. Tano K, Mamuanga MD, Faminow, Swallow B. Using co-joint analysis to estimate farmers’ preferences for cattle traits in West Africa. Ecological Economics. 2003;45:393-407. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00093-4.
  14. Jabbar MA, Diedhiou ML. Does breed matter to cattle farmers and buyers? In: Evidence from West Africa. Ecological Economics. 2003;45(3): p.461-472. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00097-1.
  15. Ejlertsen M, Poole J, Marshall K. Traditional breeding objectives and practices of goat, sheep and cattle smallholders in The Gambia and implications in relation to the design of breeding interventions. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Jan;45(1):219-29. doi: 10.1007/s11250-012-0194-1. Epub 2012 Jun 17. PMID: 22706889.
  16. Bennison JJ, Barton D, Jaitner J. The production objectives and feeding strategies of ruminant livestock owners in The Gambia: implications for policy makers. Agricultural Systems, 1997;55(3):425-444. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00002-4.
  17. Megersa B. Markemann A, Angassa A, Zarate AV. The role of livestock diversification in ensuring household food security under a changing climate in Borana. Food Security. 2014;6(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s12571-013-0314-4.
  18. Traoré SA, Markemann A, Reiber C, Piepho HP, Valle Zárate A. Production objectives, trait and breed preferences of farmers keeping N'Dama, Fulani Zebu and crossbred cattle and implications for breeding programs. Animal. 2017 Apr;11(4):687-695. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002196. Epub 2016 Oct 27. PMID: 27786142.
  19. Assefa E , Adugna T. Analysis of small ruminant production and marketing systems in Erer and Shinile districts of Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2016;4(3):73-78.
  20. Mohammed A, Alemu T. Assessment of the status of agro-pastoral systems in Erer and Shinile districts of Somali region, eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development. 2018;10(3):43-47.
  21. SAS (Statistical Analysis System). SAS for windows, Release 9.4 SAS enterprises, Inc., Cary, NC, USA. 2016.
  22. Allison PD, Christakis NA. Logit models for sets of ranked items. Sociological Methodology 1994;24:199-228.
  23. Piepho HP. A SAS macro for generating letter displays of pairwise mean comparisons. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science. 2012;7(1):4-13.
  24. Jaitner J, Sowe J, Secka-Njie E, Dempfle L. Ownership pattern and management practices of small ruminants in The Gambia - implications for a breeding programme. Small Rumin Res. 2001 May;40(2):101-108. doi: 10.1016/s0921-4488(00)00221-2. PMID: 11295391.
  25. Nandolo W, Wurzinger M, Mészáros G, Vantassell C, Sölkner J. Identification of breeding objectives in community-based goat breeding programmes in Malawi. Acta agriculture Slovenica. 2016;5:104.
  26. Hulunim G, Halima H, Kefelegn K, Aynalem H, Lobo RNB, Yetayew A, Rischkowsky B. Husbandry practices and phenotypic characteristics of indigenous goat populations in Ethiopia. African J. Agric. Res. 2017;12:2729-2741.
  27. Tatek W. Optimizing community-based breeding for indigenous goat breeds in Ethioia. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences at the University of Hohenheim. 2016.
  28. Gebre KT, Yfter KA, Teweldemedhn TG, Gebremariam T. Participatory definition of trait preferences and breeding practices of goats in Aba’ala, Afar region: as input for designing genetic improvement program. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2019. doi:10.1007/s11250-019-01968-1.
  29. Abegaz S, Haile A. Characteristics and strategies for improvement. Goat production and marketing systems in Ethiopia. International Journal of Livestock Production. 2014;5(10):150-162.
  30. Gebreyesus G. Community-based participatory characterization of the short eared Somali goat population around Dire Dawa. MSc thesis paper presented to Haramaya University. Ethiopia. 2010;219.
  31. Tesfaye G, Haile A, Markos T, Solkner J, Wurzinger M. Herd management and breeding practices of sheep owners in a mixed crop-livestock and a pastoral system of Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2010;5(8):685-691.
  32. Ahmed U. Definition of breeding objective traits for short-eared Somali goat breed in Sitti zone, eastern Ethiopia. MSC Thesis. 2021.
  33. Solomon G, Tesfaye G, Zergaw E, Tadelle D, Gemeda D, Markos T, Barbara R, Okeyo M, Maria W, Johann S, Aynalem H. A basis for designing community-based breeding programs. ICARDA working paper. Syria. 2013;47.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership