Covid-19 Research

Review Article

OCLC Number/Unique Identifier:

Biostatistical Analysis on the Generation Mechanism of Neutral Consensus and Opinion Polarization

Biology Group    Start Submission

Bin Zhao* and Xia Jiang

Volume4-Issue5
Dates: Received: 2023-04-11 | Accepted: 2023-05-20 | Published: 2023-05-30
Pages: 900-916

Abstract

We establish a biostatistical model to describe the generation mechanism of neutral consensus and opinion polarization. The paper also explores the formation mechanism of the "screaming effect", "echo chamber effect" and "information cocoon room" and studies how to use reasonable strategist avoid the "screaming effect" and "echo chamber effect" according to the biostatistical model built.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres1752


Certificate of Publication




Copyright

© 2023 Zhao B, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

How to cite this article

Zhao B, Jiang X. Biostatistical Analysis on the Generation Mechanism of Neutral Consensus and Opinion Polarization. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2023 May 30; 4(5): 900-916. doi: 10.37871/jbres1752, Article ID: JBRES1752, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1752.pdf


Subject area(s)

References


  1. Cinelli M, Gianmarco De FM, Alessandro G, Walter Q, Michele S. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021;118:9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
  2. Guess A, Brendan N, Benjamin L, Jason R. Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers. Knight Foundation. 2018;1-25.
  3. Harko T, Francisco SNL, Mak MK. Exact analytical solutions of the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) epidemic model and of the SIR model with equal death and birth rates. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 2014;236:184-194. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.03.030.
  4. Lee JK, Jihyang C, Cheonsoo K, Yonghwan K. Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication. 2014;64(4):702-722. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12077.
  5. Wang D, Yuxing Q. Echo chamber effect in rumor rebuttal discussions about COVID-19 in China: Social media content and network analysis study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(3):e27009-e27009. doi: 10.2196/27009.
  6. Wesley C, Silvio CF, Romualdo PS, Starnini M. Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science. 2019;(8)1:1-13. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0213-9.
  7. Siying D, Steve G. The echo chamber effect in Twitter: does community polarization increase? International workshop on complex networks and their applications. Springer, Cham. 2017;693:373-378. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_30.
  8. Seth F, Sharad G, Justin MR. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2016;80(S1):298-320.
  9. Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Zollo F, Petroni F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Stanley HE, Quattrociocchi W. The spreading of misinformation online. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):554-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113. Epub 2016 Jan 4. PMID: 26729863; PMCID: PMC4725489.
  10. Wei L, Zhou W. Research on solving path of negative effect of “Information Cocoon Room” in emergency. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. 2022;(579):1-12. doi: 10.1155/2022/1326579.
  11. Gossart C. Can digital technologies threaten democracy by creating information cocoons? Transforming politics and policy in the digital age. IGI Global. 2014;145-154.
  12. Peng H, Chang L. Breaking the Information cocoon: When do people actively seek conflicting information? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2021;58(1):801-803. doi: 10.1002/pra2.567.
  13. Florencia L, Cynthia AU, Juan CR, Cecilia De MM. Acoustic discrimination by hosts favors vocal trickery in fledglings of the brood-parasitic screaming cowbird Behavioral ecology and sociobiology. 2022;76(71):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00265-022-03175-9.


Comments


Swift, Reliable, and studious. We aim to cherish the world by publishing precise knowledge.

  • Brown University Library
  • University of Glasgow Library
  • University of Pennsylvania, Penn Library
  • University of Amsterdam Library
  • The University of British Columbia Library
  • UC Berkeley’s Library
  • MIT Libraries
  • Kings College London University
  • University of Texas Libraries
  • UNSW Sidney Library
  • The University of Hong Kong Libraries
  • UC Santa Barbara Library
  • University of Toronto Libraries
  • University of Oxford Library
  • Australian National University
  • ScienceOpen
  • UIC Library
  • KAUST University Library
  • Cardiff University Library
  • Ball State University Library
  • Duke University Library
  • Rutgers University Library
  • Air University Library
  • UNT University of North Texas
  • Washington Research Library Consortium
  • Penn State University Library
  • Georgetown Library
  • Princeton University Library
  • Science Gate
  • Internet Archive
  • WashingTon State University Library
  • Dimensions
  • Zenodo
  • OpenAire
  • Index Copernicus International
  • icmje
  •  International Scientific Indexing (ISI)
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • ResearchGate
  • Universidad De Lima
  • WorldCat
  • JCU Discovery
  • McGill
  • National University of Singepore Libraries
  • SearchIT
  • Scilit
  • SemantiScholar
  • Base Search
  • VU
  • KB
  • Publons
  • oaji
  • Harvard University
  • sjsu-library
  • UWLSearch
  • Florida Institute of Technology
  • CrossRef
  • LUBsearch
  • Universitat de Paris
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • ResearchBIB
  • Google Scholar
  • Microsoft Academic Search