Covid-19 Research

Review Article

Support and Pedagogical Accompaniment for Teaching Performance in Higher Education: An Experience of Innovation

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Review Article
Subject General Science
OCLC JBRES Record
Sandra Vazquez Toledo*, Cecilia Latorre Cosculluela, Sergio Cored Bandres and Marta Liesa Orus
Issue: Volume3-Issue10
Pages: 1155-1162
Received: 2022-09-24
Accepted: 2022-10-10
Published: 2022-10-12

Abstract

There is no doubt that every higher education institution aims to offer quality teaching, and the teaching function and role are key to this. However, a large number of university lecturers enter the teaching profession without prior pedagogical and didactic training. In order to address this situation and as a complementary resource, a programme of support for this function was developed and implemented in one of the faculties of the University of Zaragoza. A total of 114 university teachers participated in the programme.

In order to assess the process and results of this experience, a quantitative descriptive study was carried out, in which 51 teachers participated. Among the results, it is worth noting that a large proportion of the teachers, 76.1%, indicated that their pedagogical training had been acquired mainly through experience, not initial training. It is also worth highlighting the clear need for support in this function, essentially in the first years of teaching and in contexts in which the teaching staff is not stable, as indicated by 90.2% of the participants. The bureaucratisation of teaching tasks is present, with teachers indicating the need for more support and assistance in administrative procedures and institutional regulations. The teachers point to the need to generate a greater culture of collaboration among teaching staff and to promote synergies, showing a deficit in this respect. All these data show, among other issues, the need for support programmes as well as the need to rethink the teaching function in the higher education institution and the importance of prior preparation for training and access to it. With regard to the programme implemented, the experience of innovation and the usefulness of the programme were highly valued, generating a first step in the design of university teaching accompaniment actions.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres1571 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2022 Toledo SV, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

Toledo SV, Cosculluela CL, Bandres SC, Orus ML. Support and Pedagogical Accompaniment for Teaching Performance in Higher Education: An Experience of Innovation. 2022 Oct 12; 3(10): 1155-1162. doi: 10.37871/jbres1571, Article ID: JBRES1571, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1571.pdf

Subject area(s)

Educational Science

References

  1. Sánchez Y, Idania J. Perspectives of higher education: Towards an intercultural education of the professional in Cuba. ISLAS. 2013;55(174):130-136.
  2. Lázaro P. Methodological innovations for the digital society: Project-based learning, collaborative learning, Flipped Classroom and multiple intelligences. Tendencias pedagógicas. 2017;30:339-354. doi: 10.15366/tp2017.30.019.
  3. Mas O. University teaching staff: Their competences and training. Profesorado: Revista del Currículum y formación del profesorado. 2011;15(3):1-17.
  4. Mas O, Olmos P. University lecturers in the European Higher Education Area: Self-perception of their current teaching competences and orientations for their pedagogical training. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa. 2016;21(69):437-470.
  5. Tejedor FJ. Teacher evaluation as a strategy for improving the quality of University teaching. Journal of Education and Law. 2018;17:1-9. doi: 10.1344/re&d.v0i17.21847.
  6. Arranz P. Quality assurance systems in Higher Education in Spain. Propuesta de un modelo de acreditación para las titulaciones de Grado en Empresa [Doctoral Thesis]. Burgos: University of Burgos; 2017.
  7. Escámez J. Excellence in the university teacher. Revista Española de Pedagogía. 2013;254:11-27.
  8. Cortés A, Rodríguez A, Cano J. Competences and entrepreneurship. In: Cortés A, Rodríguez A, Val S, editors. Estrategias transformadoras para la educación: una visión para el siglo XXI. Zaragoza: Pirámide; 2018. p.247-264.
  9. Antera S, Masanova D, Mihajlov S. Professors' Competences through the Perspective of STEM Students. In: Auer M, Guralnick D, Simonics I, editors. Teaching and Learning in a Digital World: ICL; 2017. p. 332-342. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73204-6_37.
  10. Aithal PS, Kumar PM. Teaching-learning process in higher education institutions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education (IJMRME). 2016;2(1):662-676.
  11. Pérez MJ, Oliver S. Developing teaching innovation as a core element in initial university teacher training. In: Alegre de la Rosa, editor. Research on University Teaching and Faculty Development: International Perspectives. New York: Nova Publishers; 2017. p.101-120.
  12. Escribano E. Teacher performance as a factor associated with educational quality in Latin America. Revista Educación. 2018;42(2):717-739. doi: 10.15517/revedu.v42i2.27033.
  13. Pérez Gómez ÁI. Being a teacher in times of uncertainty and perplexity. Márgenes, Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Málaga. 2019;3-17. doi: 10.24310/mgnmar.v0i0.6497.
  14. Zabalza MA. Being a university professor today. La Cuestión Universitaria. 2009;5:69-81.
  15. Rué J. Teacher training for university teachers. An international perspective. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 2013;11(3):17-22. doi: 10.4995/redu.2013.5516.
  16. Mas O. La influencia de la experiencia en las competencias investigadoras del profesor universitario. Revista Complutense de Educación. 2016;27(1):13-34. doi: 10.5209/rev_RCED.2016.v27.n1.44706.
  17. Perrenoud P. Ten new competencies for teaching. Invitation to the journey. Barcelona. Graó. 2004.
  18. García-Valcarcel A. La función docente del profesor universitario, su formación y desarrollo profesional. In: Garcia-Valcarcel A, editor. Didáctica universitaria. Madrid: La Muralla; 2001. p. 9-41.
  19. Rimari W. Guide for the pedagogical accompaniment of innovation projects in the regions. Lima: Fondep; 2009.
  20. Montero L, Sanz M. Entre la realidad y el deseo: Una visión del asesoramiento. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado. 2008;12(1):1-16.
  21. Pérez-Ruiz A. Acompañamiento y saber docente: desafíos de la nueva gestión escolar. Temas de Educación. 2017;23(1):59-68.
  22. Leiva M, Vásquez C. Liderazgo pedagógico: de la supervisión al acompañamiento docente. Revista Calidad en la Educación. 2019;51:225-251. doi: 10.31619/caledu.n51.635.
  23. Sánchez E. El asesoramiento psicopedagógico: Un estudio observacional sobre las dificultades de los psicopedagogos para trabajar con los profesores. Infancia y Aprendizaje. 2000;91:55-77. doi: 10.1174/021037000760087865.
  24. Izarra D. The teacher's responsibility between being a civil servant and the ethical exercise of the profession. Revista Educación. 2019;43(1):1-13. doi: 10.15517/revedu.v43i1.29064.
  25. Crisp G, Cruz L. Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in higher education. 2009;50(6):525-545. doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2.  
  26. Muschallik J, Pull K. Mentoring in higher education. Does it enhance mentees' research productivity? Education Economics. 2015;24(2):210-223. doi: 10.1080/09645292.2014.997676.
  27. Weijden I, Belder R, Arensbergen P, Besselaar P. How do young tenured professors benefit from a mentor? Effects on management, motivation and performance. Higher Education. 2015;69(2):275-287. doi: 10.1007/s10734-014-9774-5.
  28. Bozu Z, Imbernon F. Teacher education in times of change: What do beginning university teachers tell us? Profesorado. Journal of curriculum and teacher education. 2016;20(3):467-482.
  29. Cored S, Liesa M, Latorre C, Vázquez S. University students' vision of an ApS experience: independent living flats. In: Liesa M, Cored S, Latorre C, Vázquez S, Revilla A, editors. El impacto de la mentoría entre el profesor universitario en programas de Aprendizaje-Servicio. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de la Universidad de Zaragoza; 2019. p.54-59.
  30. Sánchez JC. Estadística básica aplicada a la educación. Madrid: CCS; 2007.
  31. Hernández R, Fernández C, Baptista P. Metodología de la investigación. 3rd ed. Mexico: Editorial Mc Graw-Hill; 2003.
  32. Escobar J, Cuervo A. Content validity and expert judgement: An approach to their use. Advances in Measurement. 2008;6(1):27-36. doi: 10.32870/Ap.v9n2.993.
  33. González J, Pazmiño M. Cálculo e interpretación del Alfa de Cronbach para el caso de validación de la consistencia interna de un cuestionario, con dos posibles escalas tipo Likert. Revista Publicando. 2015;2(1):62-77.
  34. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
  35. Gil-García E. Qualitative data analysis (NVivo 10). In: Pantoja-Vallejo A, editor. Manual básico para la realización de tesinas, tesis y trabajos de educación. Madrid: EOS Universitaria; 2015. p.301-325.
  36. Gaebel M, Zhang T. Trends 2018: Learning and teaching in the European Higher Education Area. Belgium: European University Association; 2018.
  37. Potter DR. Tolson DA. Mentoring guide for nursing faculty in higher education. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2014;7(3):727-732.
  38. Llerena O, Riol M. Morell D. Teacher professional development: Impact of initial training actions on new teachers at the university of ciego de Ávila. Didasc@lia: Didactics and Education. 2018;9(2):243-258.
  39. Yun JH, Baldi B, Sorcinelli MD. Mutual mentoring for early-career and underrepresented faculty: Model, research, and practice. Innovative Higher Education. 2016;41(5):441-451. doi: 10.1007/s10755-016-9359-6.
  40. Hurtado AK, Serna ML, Madueño ML. University teacher's teaching practice: Their learning context. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado. 2015;19(2):216-224.
  41. Murillo P, Mayor C, Hernández E, Sánchez M, Rodríguez JM, Altopiedi M, Torres JJ. Las necesidades formativas docentes del profesorado universitario. Fuentes. 2005;6:1-22.
  42. Pierce G. Developing new university faculty through mentoring. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development. 1998;37(1):27-38. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2011.602466.
  43. González Sanmamed M. Raposo Rivas M. Training needs of university teaching staff in the context of European convergence. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 2008;26(2):285-306.
  44. Ödalen J, Brommesson D, Erlingsson GO, Schaffer JK. Fogelgren M. Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: The effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish universities. Higher Education Research & Development. 2018;38(2):339-353. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1512955.
  45. Postareff L, Lindblom-Yla ̈nne S. Nevgi A. The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2007;23(5):557-571. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.013.
  46. Bozu Z, Canto P. El profesorado universitario en la sociedad del conocimiento: Competencias profesionales docentes. Revista de Formación e Innovación Educativa Universitaria. 2009;2(2):87-97.
  47. Novianti N. Nurlaelawati I. Pedagogical competence development of university teachers with non-education background: The case of a large university of education in Indonesia. International Journal of Education. 2019;11(2):169-177. doi: 10.17509/ije.v11i2.15711.
  48. Saravia Gallardo MA. Teacher quality: A model of academic competencies. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 2008;26(1):141-156.
  49. Heikkinen HLT, Wilkinson J, Aspfors J, Bristol L. Understanding mentoring of new teachers: Communicative and strategis practices in Australia and Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018;71:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.025.
  50. Lumpkin A. A model for mentoring university faculty. Educational Forum. 2011; 75(4):357-368. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2011.602466.
  51. Zikhali E, Luneta K, Zikhali JT. Collaboration in mentoring between teachers' colleges and primary schools-A Zimbabwean experience. Journal of Educational Studies. 2017;16(1):154-167.
  52. Calderón C, Escalera G. La evaluación de la docencia ante el reto del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Educación XX1. 2008;11:237-256. doi: 10.5944/educxx1.11.0.316.
  53. Higgs P. VanWyk B. The transformation of university teaching and learning: An African philosophical perspective. Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems. 2007;6(2):177-187. doi: 10.4314/indilinga.v6i2.26426.
  54. Martínez P, Echeverría B. Competency-based training. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 2009;29(1):125-147.
  55. Álvarez-Rojo V, Romero S, Gil-Flores J, Rodríguez-Cantero J, Clares J, Asensio I, Salmerón-Vilchez P. Training needs of university teaching staff to adapt their teaching to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Revista Electrónica de Evaluación e Investigación Educativa. 2011;17(1):1-22.
  56. Stigmar M. Peer-to-peer teaching in Higher Education: A critical literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. 2016;24(2):124-136. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.m12-25.pptu.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership