Covid-19 Research

Case Report

Discussion of MRI Findings with Surgical Correlation in Vaginal and Cervical Agenesis: A Short Review of Mullerian Duct Anomalies

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Case Report
Subject Medicine Group
OCLC 9451145296
Kritika Sharma, Rajaram Sharma*, Tapendra Nath Tiwari and Saurabh Goyal
Issue: Volume3-Issue2
Pages: 170-173
Received: 2022-02-01
Accepted: 2022-02-07
Published: 2022-02-14

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice and is considered a highly accurate tool for the evaluation of Müllerian duct anomalies to characterize the uterine and vaginal anomalies [1,2]. In clinical practice, the MRI examination is used by the clinician to reach the diagnosis, for assessing the abnormalities and planning for surgery or future intervention. The information provided by other examinations like pelvic examination, sonography, hysterosalpingography can be confirmed and complemented by MRI. The case described here illustrates the standard MRI findings of vaginal and cervical agenesis with clinical and surgical correlation and revisits the uses of MRI.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres1415 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2022 Kritika S, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

Kritika S, Rajaram S, Tapendra Nath T, Saurabh G. Discussion of MRI Findings with Surgical Correlation in Vaginal and Cervical Agenesis: A Short Review of Mullerian Duct Anomalies. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2022 Feb 14; 3(2): 170-173. doi: 10.37871/jbres1415, Article ID: JBRES1415, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1415.pdf

Subject area(s)

Womens Health and CareGynecologyReproductive Medicine

References

  1. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):19-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331020777. Epub 2004 Aug 18. PMID: 15317956.
  2. Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, Secaf E, Laros RK Jr, Hill EC. Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 1990 Sep;176(3):715-20. doi: 10.1148/radiology.176.3.2202012. PMID: 2202012.
  3. Jacob JH, Griffin WT. Surgical reconstruction of the congenitally atretic cervix: two cases. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989 Jul;44(7):556-69. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198907000-00011. PMID: 2662083.
  4. Deffarges JV, Haddad B, Musset R, Paniel BJ. Utero-vaginal anastomosis in women with uterine cervix atresia: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance. A study of 18 cases. Hum Reprod. 2001 Aug;16(8):1722-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1722. PMID: 11473972.
  5. Acién P, Acién M, Sánchez-Ferrer M. Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod. 2004 Oct;19(10):2377-84. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh423. Epub 2004 Aug 27. PMID: 15333604.
  6. Al-Jaroudi D, Saleh A, Al-Obaid S, Agdi M, Salih A, Khan F. Pregnancy with cervical dysgenesis. Fertil Steril. 2011 Dec;96(6):1355-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.029. Epub 2011 Oct 7. PMID: 21982728.
  7. Reinhold C, Hricak H, Forstner R, Ascher SM, Bret PM, Meyer WR, Semelka RC. Primary amenorrhea: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1997 May;203(2):383-90. doi: 10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114092. PMID: 9114092.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership