Covid-19 Research

Research Article

Neph E Club-Successful Social Media Learning Model-Six Years on with 1K Nephrologist as Members

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Research Article
Subject Medicine Group
OCLC 9342073598
Ravichandran Palani*, Evamaria B Kaiser and Soundarajan Periyaswamy
Issue: Volume2-Issue9
Pages: 771-776
Received: 2021-09-01
Accepted: 2021-09-06
Published: 2021-09-08

Abstract

Introduction: Social Media (SoMe) is used for the rapid dissemination of information and learning but has its limiting factors. An integrated learning model labeled “Neph E Club” was initiated in 2015. Various social media platforms were used to achieve the goal of SoMe education and lifelong learning. A retrospective study was done to analyze this education model.

Methods: Six years of experience with Neph E Club’s social media education model allowed us to look back on the essential components of the SoMe model from 2015 to 2021. Objectives, member recruitment, social media platform, content development, and sustainability were among the aspects investigated and analyzed. Its benefits and downsides were also investigated.

Results: For the past 6 years, WhatsApp has been used as a SoMe platform. Other approaches such as Twitter, YouTube, dedicated server, and email methods failed to meet the target during the 6 years. There are now 1018 active members in the WhatsApp group. Downloading nephrology education resources from numerous social media learning websites and conference content to construct a 3 TB digital library and 800 GB of developed and shared content. Members were kept informed daily by sharing information gleaned from the digital library. Topics are chosen based on data analysis and group requests. Students and practitioners shared their contents which included case discussion and initiating data collections. The success of this model is reflected by having shared 2550 Audiovisual (AV) Lectures, 26700 journal articles, and 182 case discussions. Viewership numbers on average reach from 1200 to 2500 per month which indicated multiple sharing. ISN India in his presidential speech in 2017 recommended this model.

Conclusion: Neph E Club - Integrated model of learning using SoMe and offline digital Nephrology Library is a cost-effective, widely accepted model of learning in India.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres1308 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2021 Palani R, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

How to cite this article: Palani R, Kaiser EB, Periyaswamy S. Neph E Club-Successful Social Media Learning Model-Six Years on with 1K Nephrologist as Members. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2021 Sept 08; 2(9): 771-776. doi: 10.37871/jbres1308, Article ID: JBRES1308, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/jbres1308.pdf

Subject area(s)

NephrologyUrology

References

  1. Colbert GB, Topf J, Jhaveri KD, Oates T, Rheault MN, Shah S, Hiremath S, Sparks MA. The social media revolution in nephrology education gates. Kidney Int Rep. 2018;3:519-529. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.02.003
  2. Desai T, SridharanS, Parada X, GranadoRCD, Orantes C, Madariaga H, Penmatsa KR, Basu G, Amare FA. Exploring the uncharted territory of social media: the next frontier of medical education in nephrology. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2018;156-161. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfy003
  3. Jhaveri KD, Malieckal D, Israel E, Vachharajani T. Nephrology education in the electronic era - A case based review. The Open Urology & Nephrology Journal. 2012;5:29-32. doi: 10.2174/1874303X01205010029
  4. Friedman LW, Friedman HH. Using social media technologies to enhance online learning. Journal of Educators Online. 2013;10:1. doi:10.9743/JEO.2013.1.5
  5. Rondon-Berrios H, Johnston JR. Have We Embraced Active Learning in Nephrology Education? Kidney Med. 2019 Jun 8;1(3):83-85. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.05.001. PMID: 32734937; PMCID: PMC7380380.
  6. Curran V, Matthews L, Fleet L, Simmons K, Gustafson DL, Wetsch L. A Review of Digital, Social, and Mobile Technologies in Health Professional Education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017 Summer;37(3):195-206. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000168. PMID: 28834849.
  7. Ansari JAN, Khan NA. Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments. 2020;7:9. doi: 10.1186/s40561-020-00118-7
  8. Topf JM, Burgner A, Farouk S, Yau T, Sparks MA. NephMadness: Lessons from seven years on the leading edge of social media medical education. EMJ Nephrol. 2019;7:48-53.
  9. https://tinyurl.com/3c4kx4dc
  10. Jhaveri KD, Pascarelli B, Hasan A, Kozikowski A, Fishbane S, Pekmezaris R. WhatsApp ’ening in nephrology training. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2020;13:8-13. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfz045
  11. Greenhow C, Galvin S. Teaching with social media:evidence-based strategies for making remote higher educationless remote. Information and Learning Sciences. 2020;121: 513-524. doi: 10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0138
  12. Uçak E. Teaching materials developed using qr code technology in science classes, esra uçak. International Journal of Progressive Education. 2019;15:4. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2019.203.16
  13. Bayrami A. A qualitative study on the contribution of educational administrators use of social media to educational administration. European Journal of Education Studies. 2017;3:9. doi:10.5281/zenodo.890967
  14. Shah S, Topf J. Mentorship in the Digital Age: Nephrology Social Media Collective Internship. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):294-296. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09970818. Epub 2019 Jan 15. PMID: 30647092; PMCID: PMC6390911.
  15. Diniz H, Melilli E. The rise of #SocialMedia in the Nephrology world. Nefrologia. 2020;4(6):597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2020.02.003
  16. Joel R, Øyvind I. Risk, crisis, and social media. A systematic review of seven years’ research. Nordicom Review. 2017;38:1-17. doi:10.1515/nor-2017-0393
  17. Rasmussen K, Belisario JM, Wark PA, Molina JA, Loong SL, Cotic Z, Papachristou N, Riboli-Sasco E, Tudor Car L, Musulanov EM, Kunz H, Zhang Y, George PP, Heng BH, Wheeler EL, Al Shorbaji N, Svab I, Atun R, Majeed A, Car J. Offline eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. J Glob Health. 2014 Jun;4(1):010405. doi: 10.7189/jogh.04.010405. PMID: 24976964; PMCID: PMC4073241.
  18. Ferguson R. Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology, Enhanced Learning. 2012;4(5/6):304-317. doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
  19. Rondon-Berrios H, Johnston JR. Applying effective teaching and learning techniques to nephrology education. Clin Kidney J. 2016 Oct;9(5):755-62. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw083. Epub 2016 Aug 31. PMID: 27679724; PMCID: PMC5036910.
  20. Kumar N, Sharma S. Survey analysis on the usage and impact of whatsapp messenger, Global Journal of Enterprise Information System. 2017;8(3):52. doi:10.18311/gjeis/2016/15741
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership