Covid-19 Research

Retrospective Cohort Study

Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Mapping: A Diagnostic Tool for Differentiating Orbital Lymphomas from other Lesions

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Retrospective Cohort Study
Subject Medicine Group
OCLC JBRES Record
Eduardo Calheiros de Moraes, Marcos Decnop Batista Pinheiro, Terence Pires de Farias and Fernando Luiz Dias
Issue: Volume7-Issue5
Pages: 1-5
Received: 2026-05-03
Accepted: 2026-05-06
Published: 2026-05-09

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the utility of absolute and relative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC and ADCr) in differentiating orbital lymphoma from other orbital lesions.
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Participants: Thirty-Three Patients (33) presenting with orbital masses.
Methods: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies were analyzed, with calculation of absolute ADC and ADCr values. Brainstem ADC measured on the same axial plane was used as the reference for ADCr calculation. ADC and ADCr values were compared between lymphoma and non-lymphoma groups using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Main Outcome Measures: Absolute ADC and ADCr values and their diagnostic performance.
Results: Lymphomas demonstrated significantly lower ADC and ADCr values compared to non-lymphoma lesions. Median absolute ADC was 0.65 × 10?³ mm²/s (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 0.59 - 0.70) in the lymphoma group and 1.32 × 10?³ mm²/s (IQR: 1.11 - 1.57) in the non-lymphoma group. Median ADCr values were 0.86 (IQR: 0.81 - 0.92) and 1.63 (IQR: 1.35 - 1.92), respectively (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). Using a cutoff value of 1.0, absolute ADC showed higher sensitivity, whereas ADCr demonstrated higher specificity, positive predictive value, and overall accuracy.
Conclusions: Absolute and relative ADC values are useful, non-invasive imaging parameters for differentiating orbital lymphoma from other orbital lesions. Relative ADC, using the brainstem as a reference tissue, may represent a valuable complementary approach by reducing interindividual variability and improving lesion discrimination.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres2299 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2026 Moraes EC, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

Moraes EC, Pinheiro MDB, Farias TP, Dias FL. Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coeffi cient (ADC) Mapping: A Diagnostic Tool for Differentiating Orbital Lymphomas from other Lesions. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2026 May 03; 7(5): 7. Doi: 10.37872/jbres2299

Subject area(s)

OncologyOphthalmologyRadiation Therapy

References

  1. Cameron CA, Tong JY, Juniat V, Patel S, Selva D. Diagnostic Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Common Orbital Lesions: A Review. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Nov-Dec 01;38(6):515-521. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002092. PMID: 34798654.
  2. Mundhada P, Rawat S, Acharya U, Raje D. Role of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Orbital Masses. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021 Jan;31(1):102-108. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730120. Epub 2021 May 23. PMID: 34316117; PMCID: PMC8299504.
  3. Sun B, Song L, Wang X, Li J, Xian J, Wang F, Tan P. Lymphoma and inflammation in the orbit: Diagnostic performance with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 May;45(5):1438-1445. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25480. Epub 2016 Sep 20. PMID: 27649521.
  4. Sepahdari AR, Politi LS, Aakalu VK, Kim HJ, Razek AA. Diffusion-weighted imaging of orbital masses: multi-institutional data support a 2-ADC threshold model to categorize lesions as benign, malignant, or indeterminate. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):170-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3619. Epub 2013 Jul 18. PMID: 23868150; PMCID: PMC4138308.
  5. ElKhamary SM, Galindo-Ferreiro A, AlGhafri L, Khandekar R, Schellini SA. Characterization of diffuse orbital mass using Apparent diffusion coefficient in 3-tesla MRI. Eur J Radiol Open. 2018 Mar 26;5:52-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.03.001. PMID: 29719859; PMCID: PMC5926269.
  6. Surov A, Meyer HJ, Wienke A. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2020 Jan 8;9:1362. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01362. PMID: 31970081; PMCID: PMC6960101.
  7. Norris CD, Quick SE, Parker JG, Koontz NA. Diffusion MR Imaging in the Head and Neck: Principles and Applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2020 Aug;30(3):261-282. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Jun 11. PMID: 32600630.
  8. Koontz NA, Wiggins RH 3rd. Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Head and Neck Lesions With Diffusion Tensor Imaging and DWI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May;208(5):1110-1115. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16486. Epub 2017 Feb 28. PMID: 28245145.
  9. Xu XQ, Hu H, Su GY, Liu H, Hong XN, Shi HB, Wu FY. Utility of histogram analysis of ADC maps for differentiating orbital tumors. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):161-7. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.15202. PMID: 26829400; PMCID: PMC4790068.
  10. Ren J, Yuan Y, Wu Y, Tao X. Differentiation of orbital lymphoma and idiopathic orbital inflammatory pseudotumor: combined diagnostic value of conventional MRI and histogram analysis of ADC maps. BMC Med Imaging. 2018 May 2;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0246-8. PMID: 29716527; PMCID: PMC5930683.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership