Covid-19 Research

Open Access
Case Series
OCLC

Clinical Outcomes of Full Arch Immediate Fixed Prostheses Supported By a Novel Implant System with Low Speed Site Preparation A 5 Years Retrospective Case Series Google Scholar

Read • Cite • Share — permanent Open Access hosting with DOI tracking
Medicine Group
DentistrySurgery
Article Submission Portal

Volume5-Issue10
Dates: Received: 2024-10-14 | Accepted: 2024-10-25 | Published: 2024-10-27
Pages: 1403-1410

Abstract

Background: The aim of this case series was to evaluate the 5-years clinical and radiographic outcomes of immediate full-arch fixed prosthesis supported by a novel implant system characterized by a low-speed site preparation protocol.

Methods: Six medically compromised patients (3 females and 3 males) were consecutively enrolled and treated. Each patient received a fixed full-arch rehabilitations supported by two axial and two tilted implants. A total of 24 implants (N1 System, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) were placed in three mandibles and three maxillae using a low-speed drilling protocol with no irrigation. Prosthetic loading was applied within 2 hours of surgery, while then definitive restorations were placed 4 months later. Patients were scheduled for follow-up every 6 months up to 2 years and then annually. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level change was performed on regular intervals.

Results: Between February 2019 and July 2019, six patients received a full-arch fixed prosthesis on four implants. All implants reached a minimum insertion torque of 30 Newton for immediate loading. After 5 years of observation (range 62-67 months), no implants failed and all definitive prostheses were stable and functional, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 100%. After 5 years, the marginal bone loss was 1.46 ± 0.16 mm for the mandible and 1.85 ± 0.18 mm for the maxilla. Two implants (one axial and 1 tilted) in 1 patient treated in the maxillary arch reported more then 2 mm of marginal bone loss after 5 years.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the successful medium-term results seem to confirm that immediate fixed full-arch rehabilitation, supported by two anterior axial and two posterior tilted implants, could be an effective and biologically beneficial treatment for complete arch edentulism. The reduced bone remodeling evidenced after 5 years of function confirm the biologically friendly concept behind this novel implant system.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres2029

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2024 Agliardi EL, et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

How to cite this article

Agliardi EL, Pitino A, Moreo G, DOrto B, Romeo D. Clinical Outcomes of Full Arch Immediate Fixed Prostheses Supported By a Novel Implant System with Low Speed Site Preparation A 5 Years Retrospective Case Series. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2024 Oct 27; 5(10): 1403-1410. doi: 10.37871/jbres2029, Article ID: JBRES2029, Available at: https://www.jelsciences.com/articles/ jbres2029.pdf

Subject area(s)

Dentistry
Surgery

References

  1. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindström J, Hallén O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1-132. PMID: 356184.
  2. BRANEMARK PI. Vital microscopy of bone marrow in rabbit. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1959;11 Supp 38:1-82. PMID: 13658913.
  3. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100. doi: 10.3109/02844316909036699. PMID: 4924041.
  4. Del Fabbro M, Pozzi A, Romeo D, de Araújo Nobre M, Agliardi E. Outcomes of Fixed Full-Arch Rehabilitations Supported by Tilted and Axially Placed Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Sep-Oct;37(5):1003-1025. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9710. PMID: 36170316.
  5. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. "All-on-Four" immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5 Suppl 1:2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00010.x. PMID: 12691645.
  6. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous maxillae: a 1-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S88-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00080.x. PMID: 16137093.
  7. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Romeo D, Del Fabbro M. Clinical outcomes of full-arch immediate fixed prostheses supported by two axial and two tilted implants: A retrospective cohort study with 12-15 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Apr;34(4):351-366. doi: 10.1111/clr.14047. Epub 2023 Feb 22. PMID: 36760035.
  8. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70. doi: 10.3109/17453678108991776. PMID: 7246093.
  9. Singhatanadgit W. Biological responses to new advanced surface modifications of endosseous medical implants. Bone and Tissue Regeneration Insights. 2009;2. doi: 10.4137/BTRI.S315.
  10. Coelho PG, Jimbo R. Osseointegration of metallic devices: current trends based on implant hardware design. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014 Nov 1;561:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.06.033. Epub 2014 Jul 8. PMID: 25010447.
  11. Pandey C, Rokaya D, Bhattarai BP. Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 14;2022:6170452. doi: 10.1155/2022/6170452. PMID: 35747499; PMCID: PMC9213185.
  12. Bahat O, Yin X, Holst S, Zabalegui I, Berroeta E, Pérez J, Wöhrle P, Sörgel N, Brunski J, Helms JA. An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings. J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 30;11(9):2536. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092536. PMID: 35566662; PMCID: PMC9103213.
  13. Vanpee D, Gillet JB, Dupuis M. Clinical trials in an emergency setting: implications from the fifth version of the Declaration of Helsinki. J Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;26(1):127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.04.007. PMID: 14751494.
  14. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Jul;50(1):101-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90174-9. PMID: 6576145.
  15. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B. Heat caused by drilling cortical bone. Temperature measured in vivo in patients and animals. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984 Dec;55(6):629-31. doi: 10.3109/17453678408992410. PMID: 6524329.
  16. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;60(10):1160-9. doi: 10.1053/joms.2002.34992. PMID: 12378492.
  17. Kim SJ, Yoo J, Kim YS, Shin SW. Temperature change in pig rib bone during implant site preparation by low-speed drilling. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Sep-Oct;18(5):522-7. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000500016. PMID: 21085811; PMCID: PMC4246386.
  18. Abouzgia MB, James DF. Measurements of shaft speed while drilling through bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Mar;54(3):379. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90786-7. PMID: 8600253.
  19. Aghvami M, Brunski JB, Serdar Tulu U, Chen CH, Helms JA. A Thermal and Biological Analysis of Bone Drilling. J Biomech Eng. 2018 Oct 1;140(10):1010101–8. doi: 10.1115/1.4040312. PMID: 30029243; PMCID: PMC6059311.
  20. Chen CH, Coyac BR, Arioka M, Leahy B, Tulu US, Aghvami M, Holst S, Hoffmann W, Quarry A, Bahat O, Salmon B, Brunski JB, Helms JA. A Novel Osteotomy Preparation Technique to Preserve Implant Site Viability and Enhance Osteogenesis. J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):170. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020170. PMID: 30717291; PMCID: PMC6406409.
  21. Chen CH, Pei X, Tulu US, Aghvami M, Chen CT, Gaudillière D, Arioka M, Maghazeh Moghim M, Bahat O, Kolinski M, Crosby TR, Felderhoff A, Brunski JB, Helms JA. A Comparative Assessment of Implant Site Viability in Humans and Rats. J Dent Res. 2018 Apr;97(4):451-459. doi: 10.1177/0022034517742631. Epub 2017 Dec 4. PMID: 29202640; PMCID: PMC5863872.
  22. Coyac BR, Salvi G, Leahy B, Li Z, Salmon B, Hoffmann W, Helms JA. A novel system exploits bone debris for implant osseointegration. J Periodontol. 2021 May;92(5):716-726. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0099. Epub 2020 Sep 10. PMID: 32829495.
  23. Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;13(1):77-86. PMID: 15712985.
  24. Bahat O, Yin X, Holst S, Zabalegui I, Berroeta E, Pérez J, Wöhrle P, Sörgel N, Brunski J, Helms JA. An Osteotomy Tool That Preserves Bone Viability: Evaluation in Preclinical and Clinical Settings. J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 30;11(9):2536. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092536. PMID: 35566662; PMCID: PMC9103213.
  25. Meljon A, Geisendorf M. Kamber S, Fuchs F. Irastorza-Landa, A. Evaluation of heat generated by a new site preparation using low-speed tools without irrigation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;32:111.
  26. Fabbri G, Staas T, Urban I. A Retrospective Observational Study Assessing the Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Implant System with Low-Speed Site Preparation Protocol and Tri-Oval Implant Geometry. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 18;11(16):4859. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164859. PMID: 36013098; PMCID: PMC9410172.
  27. Yin X, Li J, Hoffmann W, Gasser A, Brunski JB, Helms JA. Mechanical and Biological Advantages of a Tri-Oval Implant Design. J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 28;8(4):427. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040427. PMID: 30925746; PMCID: PMC6517945.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership