Covid-19 Research

Research Article

Validation of the Arabic Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (A-COPSOQ II) among Workers in Oil and Gas Industrial Sector

Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences article abstract with citation details, DOI, publication dates, subject areas, full text links, and references.

View DOI Submit Manuscript

Article Details

Publication record, authors, dates, abstract, and full text access.

Open Access
Article Type Research Article
Subject Medicine Group
OCLC 9124858199
Osman NA, Bedwani RN, Shehata GM, Emam MM and Amgad M Rabie*
Issue: Volume2-Issue6
Pages: 496-508
Received: 2021-05-17
Accepted: 2021-06-18
Published: 2021-06-21

Abstract

Introduction: The undisputed increase of the relevance of measuring the work-related psychosocial factors is confronted with a lack of qualified well-documented measuring instruments covering all important aspects.

Aim: To develop and validate a standardized Arabic version of the COPSOQ II for evaluating the psychosocial environment at the oil and gas workplace.
Method: COPSOQ network guidelines for validation studies were followed. The original Danish COPSOQ II (Long version) was meticulously translated and comprehensively validated among an adaptation sample of 500 oil and gas industry workers in the Suez Oil Processing Company in Egypt. Only 438 workers completed the questionnaire in Arabic and English languages with demonstrated sociodemographic data (Yielding a response rate of 87.6%). Psychometric properties of COPSOQ II scale items were depicted in terms of descriptive statistics, feasibility analysis, and internal consistency. Furthermore, A-COPSOQ II was tested for factorial validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: Mean age of the study participants was 35 ± 6 years. Scales of Arabic COPSOQ depicted a great Concordance and Reliability (C-α > 0.7). Content Validity Index (CVI) was estimated to be 0.87; ranging from 0.7 - 0.9. Models of exploratory factor analyses projected a reflective working model with reasonable results in 33 out of 41 overall scales. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed an acceptable fit (X2 = 745.67, X2/df = 2.09, SRMR = 0.058, CFI = 0.87).

Conclusion: Arabic version of COPSOQ II is a relevant and culturally accepted conceptual instrument for tracking psychosocial hazards and promoting a safe environment for all workers.

FullText HTML FullText PDF DOI: 10.37871/jbres1266 Crossmark

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication

Copyright

© 2021 Osman NA. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 Creative CommonsAttribution

How to cite this article

Osman NA, Bedwani RN, Shehata GM, Emam MM, Rabie AM. Validation of the Arabic Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (A-COPSOQ II) among Workers in Oil and Gas Industrial Sector. J Biomed Res Environ Sci. 2021 June 21; 2(6): 496-508. doi: 10.37871/jbres1266, Article ID: jbres1266

Subject area(s)

Mental HealthPsychiatry

References

  1. Aminian M, Dianat I, Miri A, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. The Iranian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) for assessment of psychological risk factors at work. Health Promot Perspect. 2016 Dec 18;7(1):7-13. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2017.03. PMID: 28058236; PMCID: PMC5209652.
  2. Ayre C, Scally A. Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2018;47(1):79-86. doi: 10.1177/0748175613513808.
  3. Behr D, Sha M. Introduction: Translation of questionnaires in cross-national and cross-cultural research. Int J Transl Interpreting Res. 2018;10(2):1-4. doi:10.12807/ti.110202.2018.a01.
  4. Bergh LIV, Leka S, Zwetsloot GIJM. Tailoring Psychosocial Risk Assessment in the Oil and Gas Industry by Exploring Specific and Common Psychosocial Risks. Saf Health Work. 2018 Mar;9(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 10. PMID: 30363066; PMCID: PMC6111110.
  5. Bonett D, Wright T. Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning. J Organ Behav. 2014;36(1):3-15. doi:10.1002/job.1960.
  6. Burr H, Berthelsen H, Moncada S, Nübling M, Dupret E, Demiral Y, Oudyk J, Kristensen TS, Llorens C, Navarro A, Lincke HJ, Bocéréan C, Sahan C, Smith P, Pohrt A; international COPSOQ Network. The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Saf Health Work. 2019 Dec;10(4):482-503. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6. PMID: 31890332; PMCID: PMC6933167.
  7. Chen H, Wang F. Wisdom: Structure, Category, Measurement and Relationships to Related Variables. Adv Psychol Sci. 2013;21(1):108-117. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2013.00108.
  8. COPSOQ International Network. COPSOQ: What is it? [Online]. 24 March 2021.
  9. https://bit.ly/35f0ryo
  10. Corner RA, Kielhofner G, Lin FL. Construct validity of a work environment impact scale. Work. 1997;9(1):21-34. doi: 10.3233/WOR-1997-9104. PMID: 24441922.
  11. Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. doi: 10.1007/bf02310555.
  12. Dupret E, Bocéréan C, Teherani M, Feltrin M, Pejtersen JH. Psychosocial risk assessment: French validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Scand J Public Health. 2012 Jul;40(5):482-90. doi: 10.1177/1403494812453888. Epub 2012 Jul 24. PMID: 22833558.
  13. Egypt Oil & Gas. Suez oil Processing Company (SOPC) [Online]. 24 March 2021.
  14. https://bit.ly/3pSyKVJ
  15. EU-OSH (European Union Occupational Health and Safety at Work): EU Strategic Framework on Health and Safety at Work 2014-2020. In: The Commission to the European Parliament, Document no. 52014DC0332. 24 March 2021.
  16. https://bit.ly/3pPOmt1
  17. Ferraro T, Pais L, Rebelo Dos Santos N, Moreira J. The Decent Work Questionnaire: Development and validation in two samples of knowledge workers. Int Labour Rev. 2018;157(2):243-65. doi:10.1111/ilr.12039.
  18. Flora DB, Labrish C, Chalmers RP. Old and new ideas for data screening and assumption testing for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 1;3:55. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00055. PMID: 22403561; PMCID: PMC3290828.
  19. Frot B, Nandy P, Maathuis M. Robust causal structure learning with some hidden variables. J R Stat Soc: Series B (Stat Methodol). 2019;81(3):459-487. doi:10.1111/rssb.12315.
  20. Isha ASN, Javaid MU, Zaib Abbasi A, Bano S, Zahid M, Memon MA, Rehman U, Nübling M, Sabir AA, Ur Rehman S, Imtiaz N. Malay Validation of Copenhagen Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire in Context of Second Generation Statistical Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 3;2020:7680960. doi: 10.1155/2020/7680960. PMID: 32090111; PMCID: PMC7025471.
  21. Jensen MP. Questionnaire validation: a brief guide for readers of the research literature. Clin J Pain. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):345-52. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200311000-00002. PMID: 14600534.
  22. Knekta E, Runyon C, Eddy S. One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Using Factor Analysis to Gather Validity Evidence When Using Surveys in Your Research. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;18(1):rm1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064. PMID: 30821600; PMCID: PMC6757227.
  23. Kongsvik T, Gjøsund G, Vikland K. HSE culture in the petroleum industry: Lost in translation?. Saf Sci. 2016;81(1): 81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.019.
  24. Kortum E, Leka S. Tackling psychosocial risks and work-related stress in developing countries: The need for a multilevel intervention framework. Int J Stress Manag. 2014;21(1): 7-26. doi: 10.1037/a0035033.
  25. Lachenbruch P, Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84(408):1096. doi: 10.2307/2290095.
  26. Marcatto F, Colautti L, Larese Filon F, Luis O, Ferrante D. The HSE Management Standards Indicator Tool: concurrent and construct validity. Occup Med (Lond). 2014 Jul;64(5):365-71. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqu038. Epub 2014 Mar 22. PMID: 24659107.
  27. Moncada S, Utzet M, Molinero E, Llorens C, Moreno N, Galtés A, Navarro A. The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain--a tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace. Am J Ind Med. 2014 Jan;57(1):97-107. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22238. Epub 2013 Sep 6. PMID: 24009215.
  28. Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS. The development of the psychosocial work environment in Denmark from 1997 to 2005. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009 Jul;35(4):284-93. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1334. Epub 2009 May 29. PMID: 19479116.
  29. Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS, Borg V, Bjorner JB. The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):8-24. doi: 10.1177/1403494809349858. PMID: 21172767.
  30. Rosário S, Azevedo LF, Fonseca JA, Nienhaus A, Nübling M, da Costa JT. The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2017 Aug 9;12:24. doi: 10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9. PMID: 28808478; PMCID: PMC5550997.
  31. Šimkovic M, Träuble B. Robustness of statistical methods when measure is affected by ceiling and/or floor effect. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 19;14(8):e0220889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220889. PMID: 31425561; PMCID: PMC6699673.
  32. Thorsen SV, Bjorner JB. Reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):25-32. doi: 10.1177/1403494809349859. PMID: 21172768.
  33. Widerszal-Bazyl M. Kopenhaski Kwestionariusz Psychospołeczny (COPSOQ) – właściwości psychometryczne wybranych skal w polskiej wersji [Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) - Psychometric properties of selected scales in the Polish version]. Med Pr. 2017 May 16;68(3):329-348. Polish. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00443. Epub 2017 Apr 5. PMID: 28512362.
  34. Yusoff M. ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation. Educi Med J. 2019;11(2):49-54. doi:10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6.
Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable
Submit Manuscript Membership