Special Issue
Advances in Environmental Health and Toxicology
Guest Editor: Editorial Team — Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences
Submission
Covid-19 Research
Safety Profile of COVID-19 Vaccines: Retrospective Analysis of Short, Medium, and Long-Term Side Effects: The Military Hospital Experience – Read more Evaluating the Efficacy of Different SARS-Cov-2 Drug Targets Using the Topo-Geometrical Superposition Algorithm, Molecular Docking and Chemical Reactivity Frameworks – Read more Preventing COVID-19 Infection by Complementary Medicine and Oral Health – Read more Analysis of Body Temperature in Patients with Trauma Visiting a Local Emergency Medical Center during the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak – Read more N95 Respirator Fit Testing Experience during the Pandemic at a Singapore Tertiary Health Institution: Streamlining Workflow and Improving Respirator Fit Rate – Read more COVID-19 is an Amplifier of Social Inequalities Structural Violence against Students with Special Learning Needs and Low Socio-Economic Status – Read more Interaction between Chronic Influenza and COVID-19: Novel Aspects of Immune System Combat – Read more Daily Life, Fear of COVID-19 and Social Support in the Older Adults in Home Isolation: A Cross-Sectional Study – Read more The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiovascular Diseases in Brazil – Read more Diversity of Non-Influenza Respiratory Viruses Associated with Influenza-Like Illness during 2009 pre and pandemic periods in Sao Paulo, Brazil, a Historical Overview – Read more Cardiovascular Complications of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in Adults – Read more Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Development of Childrens Executive Functions Implications for School-Based Interventions – Read more The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Youth Education – Read more Association between Dietary Habits, Lifestyle and Migraine Attacks During Social Isolation in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies – Read more The Brazilian Increase in Cases of Lung Cancer and COVID-19, Can They be related? – Read more The Possible Therapeutic Application of CO on COVID-19 – Read more Planetary View of COVID Impact vs. IQ & PISA Rank as National Level of Intelligence – Read more Electrophysiological Study in a Patient with Visual Deficit after Severe Coronavirus 2 Pneumonia – Read more A Presentation of Analyses of COVID-19 Vaccine Samples, Blood Samples, Urine Samples, Foot Bath Samples, Sitz Bath Samples, and Skin-Extract Samples – Read more Is Anosmia-Ageusia in COVID-19 Patients Associated with Neuro-Philic Virus Mutant and Mild Respiratory Involvement? – Read more
Home/ All Articles/ Comparative Analysis Between Urinary Complaints and the Results of the Urodinamic Study of…

Abstract & Article Details

Original Article • Vol.3, Issue 4 • ISSN: 2766-2276 • Open Access • CC BY 4.0

Open Access Original Article Vol.3, Issue 4 April 22, 2022

Comparative Analysis Between Urinary Complaints and the Results of the Urodinamic Study of Women Seen at a Urogynecology Ambulatory in Macapa-Aresume

DOI: 10.37871/jbres1452
Authors
Aljerry Dias do Rego*, Lysya Gabriela Andrade Nascimento and Lauana Gomes
Full Text PDF

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary Incontinence (UI) is investigated through clinical history, physical exam, urinalysis, voiding diary, Pad-test, urodynamic study and imaging exams.

Objective: To assess the efectiveness of the urodynamic test in proving UI.

Methodology: Retrospective-cross-sectional-observational descriptive quantitative study. We analyzed the medical records of 594 women treated at the Women Hospital and Maternity “Mãe Luzia” – WHML in Macapá – AP aged 18 years or older, with complaints of urinary incontinence and who underwent urodynamic examination without any Other associated conditions. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The research received authorization from the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of Amapá (FR 347446/011).

Results: 49.49% presented clinical complaints. Of those, 13.9% were compatible with Overactive Bladder (OAB), 11.2% with Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and 74.8% with Mixed Urinary Incontinence (MUI). 50.5% were diagnosed by urodynamics, being 0.7% normal, 15.7% OAB, 14% SUI and 69.7% MUI. 45.2% of SUI and 46.4% of MUI were concentrated in pressure loss of up to 60cmH2O. As for age, 27.7% of those with OAB were between 31-40 years old, while 38.8% with MUI 41-50 years and 28.6% with SUI 51-60. The percentagem of women who had a clinical complaint and a corresponding urodynamic finding was Only 1.7% for SUI, 52.3% for MUI and 5.7% for OAB among those evaluated. Thus, urodynmics for SUI had a sensitivity of 89.1%, specificity of 11.9%, PPV of 86.1%, NPV of 15.2%, and accuracy of 78.3%, for BH it had a senstivity of 90.5%, specificity of 36.2%, PPV of 88.4%, NPV of 41.5%, and accuracy of 82% and for IUM it has a sensitivity of 30.8% and a specificity of 75.1%, leading to a PPV of 35.0% and a NPV of 71.4%, and therefore with an accuracy of 61.7%.

Conclusion: Correspondence between clinical complaint and urodynamic study was low. Further studies are still needed in this regard for a final conclusion on the effectiveness of the urodynamic test for the diagnosis of UI.

How to Cite

Aljerry Dias do Rego*, Lysya Gabriela Andrade Nascimento and Lauana Gomes (2022). Comparative Analysis Between Urinary Complaints and the Results of the Urodinamic Study of Women Seen at a Urogynecology Ambulatory in Macapa-Aresume. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1452

Article Information

JournalJournal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences (JBRES)
ISSN2766-2276
DOI DOI 10.37871/jbres1452
Volume / IssueVol. 3, Issue 4
PublishedApril 22, 2022
Article TypeOriginal Article
Pages385-390
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — Open Access
PublisherSciRes Literature LLC, Sheridan, WY, USA
LanguageEnglish
Creative Commons BY 4.0

Published under CC BY 4.0 — free to share, copy, adapt, and redistribute with attribution.

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication — Comparative Analysis Between Urinary Complaints and the Results of the Urodinamic Study of Women Seen at a Urogynecology Ambulatory in Macapa-Aresume

Certificate verifies that this article was peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences.

Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable