Special Issue
Advances in Environmental Health and Toxicology
Guest Editor: Editorial Team — Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences
Submission
Covid-19 Research
Safety Profile of COVID-19 Vaccines: Retrospective Analysis of Short, Medium, and Long-Term Side Effects: The Military Hospital Experience – Read more Evaluating the Efficacy of Different SARS-Cov-2 Drug Targets Using the Topo-Geometrical Superposition Algorithm, Molecular Docking and Chemical Reactivity Frameworks – Read more Preventing COVID-19 Infection by Complementary Medicine and Oral Health – Read more Analysis of Body Temperature in Patients with Trauma Visiting a Local Emergency Medical Center during the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak – Read more N95 Respirator Fit Testing Experience during the Pandemic at a Singapore Tertiary Health Institution: Streamlining Workflow and Improving Respirator Fit Rate – Read more COVID-19 is an Amplifier of Social Inequalities Structural Violence against Students with Special Learning Needs and Low Socio-Economic Status – Read more Interaction between Chronic Influenza and COVID-19: Novel Aspects of Immune System Combat – Read more Daily Life, Fear of COVID-19 and Social Support in the Older Adults in Home Isolation: A Cross-Sectional Study – Read more The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiovascular Diseases in Brazil – Read more Diversity of Non-Influenza Respiratory Viruses Associated with Influenza-Like Illness during 2009 pre and pandemic periods in Sao Paulo, Brazil, a Historical Overview – Read more Cardiovascular Complications of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in Adults – Read more Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Development of Childrens Executive Functions Implications for School-Based Interventions – Read more The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Youth Education – Read more Association between Dietary Habits, Lifestyle and Migraine Attacks During Social Isolation in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies – Read more The Brazilian Increase in Cases of Lung Cancer and COVID-19, Can They be related? – Read more The Possible Therapeutic Application of CO on COVID-19 – Read more Planetary View of COVID Impact vs. IQ & PISA Rank as National Level of Intelligence – Read more Electrophysiological Study in a Patient with Visual Deficit after Severe Coronavirus 2 Pneumonia – Read more A Presentation of Analyses of COVID-19 Vaccine Samples, Blood Samples, Urine Samples, Foot Bath Samples, Sitz Bath Samples, and Skin-Extract Samples – Read more Is Anosmia-Ageusia in COVID-19 Patients Associated with Neuro-Philic Virus Mutant and Mild Respiratory Involvement? – Read more
Home/ All Articles/ Strengths and Bias of the Different Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Multiple M…

Abstract & Article Details

Clinical Trials • Vol.5, Issue 7 • ISSN: 2766-2276 • Open Access • CC BY 4.0

Open Access Clinical Trials Vol.5, Issue 7 July 24, 2024

Strengths and Bias of the Different Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Progress after Front-Line use of Lenalidomide: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials

DOI: 10.37871/jbres1962
Authors
Giuseppe Mele, Nicola Sgherza, Domenico Pastore and Pellegrino Musto*
Full Text PDF

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) who relapse after exposure to lenalidomide in the context of their first line therapeutic strategy are becoming a growing and clinically relevant population. We performed a systematic review of available clinical trials evaluating the efficacy, in terms of Progression-Free Survival (PFS), of different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of MM patients at first relapse after front-line use of lenalidomide.

Methods: Publications of interest were searched on the PubMed database. The following search terms were employed: relapsed multiple myeloma, refractory multiple myeloma, first relapse, second line therapy, and lenalidomide-refractory, lenalidomide-exposed.

Results: Triplets including anti-CD38 antibodies, carfilzomib and dexamethasone obtained more significant PFS regardless of the number of prior therapies. Other trials also demonstrated a not negligible benefit with combinations containing pomalidomide, particularly in early lines of therapy. However, the variable amount of Len-Exp/Len-R patients enrolled in these studies and the limited number of those analyzed after progression following front-line lenalidomide, makes it difficult to select an “optimal” choice for the treatment of these MM patients at first relapse. Promising results have been more recently obtained by using combo therapies including belantamab-mafodotin and immunotherapies with CAR-T cells.

Conclusion: In absence of clear-cut data regarding specifically the effects of currently available regimens in MM patients refractory or relapsed after first-line therapies including lenalidomide, novel approaches based on immune-therapies and focused on this specific population of MM patients would warrant further specific investigation.

How to Cite

Giuseppe Mele, Nicola Sgherza, Domenico Pastore and Pellegrino Musto* (2024). Strengths and Bias of the Different Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Progress after Front-Line use of Lenalidomide: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1962

Article Information

JournalJournal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences (JBRES)
ISSN2766-2276
DOI DOI 10.37871/jbres1962
Volume / IssueVol. 5, Issue 7
PublishedJuly 24, 2024
Article TypeClinical Trials
Pages838-844
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — Open Access
PublisherSciRes Literature LLC, Sheridan, WY, USA
LanguageEnglish
Creative Commons BY 4.0

Published under CC BY 4.0 — free to share, copy, adapt, and redistribute with attribution.

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication — Strengths and Bias of the Different Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Progress after Front-Line use of Lenalidomide: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials

Certificate verifies that this article was peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences.

Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rapid review, DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable