Special Issue
Data-Driven Discovery: Biostatistics, Biometrics & Computational Science
Guest Editor: Yingjun Zhao — Department of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Xinjiang University, China
Submission
Covid-19 Research
Safety Profile of COVID-19 Vaccines: Retrospective Analysis of Short, Medium, and Long-Term Side Effects: The Military Hospital Experience – Read more Evaluating the Efficacy of Different SARS-Cov-2 Drug Targets Using the Topo-Geometrical Superposition Algorithm, Molecular Docking and Chemical Reactivity Frameworks – Read more Preventing COVID-19 Infection by Complementary Medicine and Oral Health – Read more Analysis of Body Temperature in Patients with Trauma Visiting a Local Emergency Medical Center during the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak – Read more N95 Respirator Fit Testing Experience during the Pandemic at a Singapore Tertiary Health Institution: Streamlining Workflow and Improving Respirator Fit Rate – Read more COVID-19 is an Amplifier of Social Inequalities Structural Violence against Students with Special Learning Needs and Low Socio-Economic Status – Read more Interaction between Chronic Influenza and COVID-19: Novel Aspects of Immune System Combat – Read more Daily Life, Fear of COVID-19 and Social Support in the Older Adults in Home Isolation: A Cross-Sectional Study – Read more The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiovascular Diseases in Brazil – Read more Diversity of Non-Influenza Respiratory Viruses Associated with Influenza-Like Illness during 2009 pre and pandemic periods in Sao Paulo, Brazil, a Historical Overview – Read more Cardiovascular Complications of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in Adults – Read more Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Development of Childrens Executive Functions Implications for School-Based Interventions – Read more The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Youth Education – Read more Association between Dietary Habits, Lifestyle and Migraine Attacks During Social Isolation in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies – Read more The Brazilian Increase in Cases of Lung Cancer and COVID-19, Can They be related? – Read more The Possible Therapeutic Application of CO on COVID-19 – Read more Planetary View of COVID Impact vs. IQ & PISA Rank as National Level of Intelligence – Read more Electrophysiological Study in a Patient with Visual Deficit after Severe Coronavirus 2 Pneumonia – Read more A Presentation of Analyses of COVID-19 Vaccine Samples, Blood Samples, Urine Samples, Foot Bath Samples, Sitz Bath Samples, and Skin-Extract Samples – Read more Is Anosmia-Ageusia in COVID-19 Patients Associated with Neuro-Philic Virus Mutant and Mild Respiratory Involvement? – Read more
Home/ All Articles/ Predictors of Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patien…

Abstract & Article Details

Research Article • Vol.3, Issue 9 • ISSN: 2766-2276 • Open Access • CC BY 4.0

Open Access Research Article Vol.3, Issue 9 September 30, 2022

Predictors of Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients

DOI: 10.37871/jbres1567
Authors
Amirhassan Shafaatpour, Hakimeh Sadeghian*, Ali Kazemisaied, Masoumeh Lotfi Tokaldany and Arash Jalali

Abstract

Background: Usefulness of echocardiogram-associated markers for prediction of the response of the patients with cardiomyopathy to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is under debate.

Method: In a cross sectional retrospective design, we analyzed data from 69 cardiomyopathy patients (mean age = 57.59 ± 11.17 years, 69.6% male) with New-York-Heart-Association class ≥ III, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%, and QRS duration > 120 ms who underwent CRT. Transthoracic echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging were performed before CRT and transthoracic echocardiography was repeated after CRT. More than 5% increase in the LVEF within 48 hours post CRT was considered as acute response.

Results: After CRT, 36 (52.2%) patients were acute responders. Before CRT, responders had a remarkably higher frequency of diabetes mellitus (36.1% vs.15.2%, p = 0.048), lower left ventricular end systolic volume (125.82 ± 179.73 vs. 179.73 ± 77.51 ml, p = 0.002) and end diastolic volume (165.03 ± 67.09 vs. 236.06 ± 93.24 ml, p < 0.001) compared to none responders. Other echocardiography characteristics were not significantly different. In multivariable analysis, left ventricular end systolic volume remained the sole independent predictor of acute response. A cut-off of 135 ml for left ventricular end systolic volume had a good sensitivity (67.65%) and specificity (72.73%) to distinguish responders from non-responders.

Conclusion: More than half of the cardiomyopathy patients had improvement ≥ 5% in LVEF within 48 hours after CRT. No relationship was found between formerly defined pre-CRT echocardiographic dyssynchrony markers and acute response. Left ventricular end systolic volume was the sole independent predictor of acute response and a threshold of 135 ml could discriminate acute responders to CRT.

Research Topics

Get email alerts when new articles are published in these topics Subscribe for Alerts

How to Cite

Amirhassan Shafaatpour, Hakimeh Sadeghian*, Ali Kazemisaied, Masoumeh Lotfi Tokaldany and Arash Jalali (2022). Predictors of Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1567

Article Information

JournalJournal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences (JBRES)
ISSN2766-2276
DOI DOI 10.37871/jbres1567
Volume / IssueVol. 3, Issue 9
ReceivedSeptember 27, 2022
AcceptedSeptember 30, 2022
PublishedSeptember 30, 2022
Article TypeResearch Article
Pages1130-1138
LicenseCC BY 4.0 — Open Access
PublisherSciRes Literature LLC, Sheridan, WY, USA
LanguageEnglish
Creative Commons BY 4.0

Published under CC BY 4.0 — free to share, copy, adapt, and redistribute with attribution.

Certificate of Publication

Certificate of Publication — Predictors of Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Cardiomyopathy Patients

Certificate verifies that this article was peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences.

Publish with JBRES — Peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary Open Access with rigorous double-blind review, CrossRef DOI, and global visibility.
Double-Blind CrossRef DOI Discoverable