From Data to Reflection: Why a Scientist Turns toward Autoethnography and the Practice of Writing One’s Own Journey

After decades of empirical research, I found myself writing fewer data-driven papers and more reflective notes and autoethnographic vignettes. This shift is not a retreat from science but an extension of it. The act of reflection allows scientists to make sense of their professional lives, intellectual commitments, and emotional labour within academia. The objective of this paper is to examine why and how I turned toward reflective and autoethnographic writing as a mature scholar trained in ecotoxicology and environmental science. Drawing from my personal experience, I argue that reflective writing restores authenticity, situates knowledge within lived real contextual concepts, and allows scholars to reclaim voice from the impersonal conventions of research publication. Using a first-person narrative style supported by scholarship on reflexivity and scientific identity, I describe three phases of transformation: saturation of novelty, rediscovery of meaning, and integration of self and science. This reflective paper concludes by calling for reflective literacy as a legitimate practice of scientific renewal, mentorship, and life-time unlearning and relearning.

Environmental science has long relied on measurable facts to speak for themselves [1,2]. In my own academic career as an ecotoxicologist, I have spent decades quantifying heavy metal concentrations, modelling their speciation in sediments, and relating these patterns to bioaccumulation in coastal molluscs such as Perna viridis, Telescopium telescopium, and Cerithidea obtusa [3-7]. These empirical studies generated reproducible evidence that informed biomonitoring, risk assessment, and coastal management. Yet as the datasets accumulated, I began to sense a growing dissonance between the precision of the numbers and the partial silence about the human experience behind them, the fatigue of long field samplings, the ethical unease of witnessing coastal degradation, and the layered responsibilities of mentoring students while meeting institutional expectations. This dissonance forms the starting point of the present reflection: when and why does a scientist begin to feel that data alone no longer speak fully?

The motivation for this paper arises from that turning point. As I reached professional maturity, the drive to publish “more data” became less compelling than the question of what the long practice of biomonitoring and teaching meant for my own identity, my students, and my academic community. I realized that my scientific work was embedded in emotional, institutional, and relational contexts that conventional empirical articles seldom acknowledge. At the same time, I noticed similar movements in other fields. Researchers in science education, multicultural teacher education, political science, and environmental justice were turning toward autoethnography and reflective writing to make sense of their professional and personal journeys, especially when navigating cross-cultural collaborations, disciplinary boundaries, and gendered or racialised environments [8-13]. These studies demonstrated that lived experience is not a mere anecdotal backdrop, but a legitimate source of insight into how science and education are actually practiced, challenged, and sustained over time [14-17]. My own earlier reflective notes on Mount Tsukuba, on basic ecological research, on coastal mussels as sentinels, and on the emotional ecology of academic life suggested that similar tools could be used to interpret a career in ecotoxicology through the lens of personal narrative [15-21].

This convergence reveals a clear gap. While autoethnographic approaches are increasingly used in teacher education, social sciences, and environmental justice work [10-13,22,23], there are still relatively few systematic reflections written by scientists whose primary training and identity are rooted in long-term empirical research in environmental toxicology and biomonitoring. In particular, the voices of senior or mid-career scientists who have spent decades generating datasets, but who then turn toward reflection as a form of professional and personal renewal, remain underrepresented. The central issue of this paper can therefore be expressed as follows: how and why does a mature scientist trained in empirical ecotoxicology turn toward reflective and autoethnographic writing, and what does this turn contribute to scientific identity, pedagogy, and the practice of environmental science?

Guided by this problem, this paper pursues three main objectives. First, it seeks to explain the personal and institutional conditions under which empirical saturation and declining novelty create space (and even necessity) for reflective and autoethnographic writing. Second, it aims to justify reflection and autoethnography as complementary, rather than oppositional, to conventional data-driven science, by showing how they restore authenticity, contextualize scientific labour, and make visible the “unseen foundations” of research such as student growth, personality, and emotional resilience [21,24-26]. Third, it examines how reflective writing can function as a pedagogical and mentoring tool that links generations of scientists, using narrative to communicate values, vulnerabilities, and forms of perseverance that never appear in methods or results sections [15,27,28].

Methodologically, this paper employs an autoethnographic and reflective narrative approach. I draw on my own published reflective essays on basic research, passion and mentorship, coastal biomonitoring, hydrology, environmental education, and professional disappointments and reconnections [26-29], placing them in dialogue with recent literature on autoethnography, reflexivity, and environmental and science education [8-14,27-30]. These texts are treated as data about my evolving scientific identity, emotional responses, and mentoring practices. Through close reading, thematic synthesis, and comparative engagement with the broader scholarship, I identify key phases in my trajectory from data-focused research to reflective and autoethnographic writing. The analysis is not statistical but interpretive: it traces patterns of saturation, rediscovery of meaning, and integration of self and science across time.

The novelty of this paper lies in its position at the intersection of ecotoxicology, long-term biomonitoring, and autoethnographic reflection. Prior autoethnographic studies have documented the experiences of science educators, early-career scholars, and researchers navigating multicultural or politicized academic spaces [8,16,17,23]. By contrast, this paper foregrounds the narrative of a scientist whose professional authority was initially built on conventional empirical outputs [1-7,18-20], and who then deliberately turns toward reflective writing without abandoning scientific standards. It shows how mussels, mangroves, cracked courts after storms, and classroom episodes become not only ecological or pedagogical data, but also narrative anchors for reinterpreting a lifetime of scientific practice [21,24-26]. In doing so, the paper connects long-term environmental monitoring to contemporary discussions about environmental impacts, planetary health, and the emotional and ethical labour of sustaining scientific careers [17,29,30].

In summary, the paper argues that when data no longer speak fully, the scientist’s situated voice must be allowed to enter the conversation. The main findings of this reflective inquiry are that (i) the turn toward autoethnography emerges from a felt saturation of empirical novelty combined with the desire for authenticity; (ii) reflection reconfigures earlier empirical work as a resource for meaning-making, pedagogy, and mentorship rather than as a closed chapter; and (iii) autoethnographic writing provides a structured way to integrate personal, institutional, and ecological dimensions of scientific life. The conclusions highlight reflection as a form of scientific renewal that honours empirical rigour while resisting the depersonalisation of academic labour. The importance of this work lies in its invitation to other scientists, particularly in environmental fields, to recognise reflective literacy as part of their professional repertoire: a means to preserve intellectual heritage, support students and colleagues, and remain alive to the ethical and emotional significance of studying a planet under stress.  

From observation to reflection: The scientist’s double vision

Science trains the mind to attend to what is external, measurable, and repeatable. Autoethnographic writing widens that practice by permitting the researcher to observe the self with the same care that is given to the field site [8,9,31-33]. In earlier reflective papers I have shown how being in a landscape, such as during the Mount Tsukuba visit, can serve both as ecological observation and as moral elevation, because place becomes a teacher of values as well as of biology [15,34,35]. Similar attempts to integrate place, identity, and environmental learning have been reported in environmental and sustainability education, where narration is used to connect situated ecological problems to the learner’s own positionality [16,17,32]. The same movement occurs in laboratory and coastal work. When I record memories of mussels as sentinels of pollution along the Malaysian coast, I am not only reporting trace metals, I am also tracing my own attachment to long term biomonitoring and to science as public service [18,19]. In that sense scientific observation and reflective narration meet at a single point of attentiveness. Both require precision, honesty, and a search for pattern, much like what Reinertsen AB, et al. [12] called “crossings” between science and society in autoethnographic stories from the High North.

Reflection makes the self-visible as part of the data [31,34]. The flooded court in front of the laboratory [20], the mangrove stands that changes colour with salinity stress, or the silent student who still submits a late report are not trivial episodes. They are situated encounters that reveal how the researcher has grown in patience, ecological sensitivity, and educational purpose. This is similar to the way I wrote about passion and mentorship enduring through basic ecological research, where the scientific activity and the person doing it could not be separated without losing meaning [21,36-37]. Autoethnographic accounts from science and teacher education show the same pattern: personal experience becomes evidence for understanding practice, especially in contexts of marginality, collaboration, or institutional challenge [11,38-40]. Through this double vision, knowledge becomes relational. It connects the observer and the observed, the scientist and society, the present researcher and the future students who will inherit the same field sites, just as Parker [22], Pelfonen [23], and others working with work-integrated and disciplinary learning [36, 39] argued that reflection strengthens environmental science education by explicitly linking practice to context.

The turn toward authenticity and meaning

My turn to reflection began with a desire to recover authenticity in academic writing, a concern shared by many scientists who write explicitly about their journeys and disciplinary futures [34,35,39]. Conventional articles often require distance. Reflective notes require presence. In my paper on writing from the heart and working with the clock, I argued that productivity is sustainable only when writing is aligned with the inner motivations of the scholar, not merely with external metrics [24]. Autoethnographic vignettes give me that alignment. They let me write as a professor who supervises students, as a coastal ecologist who has seen degradation, and as a person who sometimes feels disappointed yet still chooses reconnection, as I described in my writing on silent WhatsApp messages [25]. Similar authenticity-seeking is visible in Black feminist and environmental justice autoethnographies, where writing the self becomes a response to silencing and a way to reclaim voice in disciplines that privilege detachment [10,31,32,40].

These small narrative units hold moments that would never enter a methods section. Watching students measure salinity in mangrove water, noticing the awkward silence after a failed experiment, or receiving a brief message of appreciation from a former student are part of what I have called the emotional ecology of research. They tell me why I continue to teach and to monitor coasts even when novelty declines. This is similar to my reflection that basic is still basic, where I insisted that biological fundamentals and human sincerity remain valuable even in the era of rapid innovation [26,34]. Scholars in environmental and science education have likewise shown that integrating communication, reflection, and real-world relevance makes scientific learning more human and more durable [27,28, 41]. Authenticity in this sense is not a stylistic choice. It is an ethical practice that restores coherence between the inner life of the academic and the outward scientific identity, and it follows a broader qualitative trend in which personal narrative is treated as legitimate scientific reasoning [9,38,39].

Reflection as renewal: Reframing saturation in research

After many empirical studies, intellectual saturation arrived. The statistical patterns in heavy metal studies or in hydrological interpretations of coastal mussels became predictable. At that point, writing another dataset felt like repetition. Reflection reopened curiosity. It did so by shifting the research question from “What else can I measure?” to “What does this long practice mean for me, my students, and my community?” My article on unseen foundations made this argument directly by showing that student growth and personality often support the research enterprise more than is acknowledged in technical reports [29]. Reflection made those foundations visible. This move is consistent with environmental science reflections that treat local data and local experience as resources for reprioritizing policy, curriculum, and community relationships [17,30-33,41].

In reflective and autoethnographic work, novelty is not the discovery of a new variable. Novelty is the rediscovery of self-knowledge. Maturity in science can therefore be read not as an end point but as readiness for synthesis. My coastal pieces on mussels as recorders of pollution and on Perna viridis as a coastal sentinel were written precisely to gather decades of field experience into conceptual and educational insights [18,19]. Similar to what Reinertsen AB, et al. [12,33] described as crossing disciplines and cultures, reflection allowed me to cross temporal layers in my own work, from early biomonitoring to present-day planetary health framing. Reflection thus became a method of renewal that translated long term ecological monitoring into guidance for future researchers and for policy conversations about planetary health. It kept the research line alive without forcing artificial innovation, echoing the argument that environmental education reforms and disciplinary renewal are best grounded in reflective practice and thoughtful advice to younger scientists rather than in constant methodological novelty [23,34,35,37].

The pedagogy of reflection: Mentorship and human connection

Reflection changed the way I teach. I realized that students remember stories more than formulas. When I tell them about climbing Mount Tsukuba and thinking about elevation, ethics, and ecology, they hear that scientific work is also a moral journey [15]. When I narrate how a short digital reply restored collegial joy after disappointment, they hear that academic relationships can be mended through small gestures [25,37]. When I describe how passion endured in a career grounded in basic ecological research, they see that perseverance is realistic and not merely motivational language [21,42-45]. These are pedagogical uses of reflection, and they are aligned with classroom and training approaches that intentionally scaffold communication, reflection, and real-world relevance in science learning [45-48].

Autoethnographic storytelling turns private experiences into shared lessons. It links generations of scientists by recording how fieldwork, supervision, and writing actually feel. My pieces on basic biological philosophy and on the role of personality in learning were written so that younger scholars would know that attention to character and inner drive is as important as sampling design [26,29]. In higher education more broadly, narrative has been used to surface the invisible labour of navigating hostile, toxic, or racialized environments, thereby providing models of resilience for students and junior academics [13,31,40]. By bringing these narratives into mentoring sessions I am modelling openness, admitting uncertainty, and celebrating small clarity. In this sense reflection is not only self-expression. It is service to the academic community because it preserves experiential knowledge that would otherwise be lost, much the same way that early environmental science projects in schools and public-facing scientific initiatives showed that local experiential reflection could anchor environmental concern and civic engagement for young learners and communities [22,46-48].

Writing reflection notes and autoethnographic vignettes is an ethical act. It resists the depersonalization of scientific labour and insists that the scholar’s inner world matters. It also preserves intellectual heritage: the lived experience of scientific life that cannot be captured by citation metrics.

As I move further in my career, I see reflection not as an alternative to research but as its completion. Data describe the world; reflection explains our place in it. When I write now, I no longer separate the scientist from the human being. I write to remember, to teach, to educate myself, and to remain alive to the meaning of inquiry itself: the living world that full of deceits.

1. Yap CK, Ismail A, Tan SG, Omar H. Correlations between speciation of Cd, Cu, Pb And Zn in sediment and their concentrations in total soft tissue of green-lipped mussel Perna viridis from the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Environ Int. 2002 Apr;28(1-2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00015-6. PMID: 12046948.
2. Yap CK, Mashinshian MA, Ismail A, Zakaria MP. Relationships and comparative studies of heavy metals and organic PAH compounds in the soft tissues of Perna viridis. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment. 2010;14(1):56-61.
3. Noorhaidah A, Yap CK. Correlations between speciation of Zn in sediment and their concentrations in different soft tissue of Telescopium telescopium from the intertidal area of Peninsular Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 2010;33(1):79-90.
4. Yap CK, Edward FB. Distribution of heavy metals in the different parts of Cerithidea obtusa and the relationships between metal distribution and allometric parameters of the snail. Environment Asia. 2010;3(2):38-48. doi: 10.14456/ea.2010.22.
5. Yap CK, Tan SG. A study on the potential of the periostracum of Perna viridis as a biomonitoring material for Pb in tropical coastal waters based on correlation analysis. Sains Malaysiana, 2011;40(8):809–819.
6. Yap CK, Rahim Ismail A. Relationships of distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates and the physico-chemical parameters from Semenyih River by using correlation and multiple linear stepwise regression analyses. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 2011;34(2):229–245.
7. Amin B, Nurrachmi I, Ismail A, Yap CK. Heavy metal concentrations in the intertidal gastropod Nerita lineata and their relationships to those in its habitats: A case study in Dumai coastal waters. Wetland Science. 2009;7(4):351-357.
8. Aksöz B, Kaya E,  Çilekrenkli A.  A science teacher’s autoethnographic reflections on teaching nature of science. Science and Education. 2025;34(1):247-280. doi: 10.1007/s11191-023-00462-3.
9. Shim SW. Between two cultures: An autoethnographic reflection on multicultural competence as a science educator. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2021;34(10):928-938. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2021.1956625.
10. Thomas L. A Black feminist autoethnographic reflection on mentoring in the discipline of political science. PS: Political Science & Politics. 2020;53(4):788-792. doi: 10.1017/S104909652000044X.
11. Osuolale OO, Fateye B. Two sides of the coin: An autoethnographic analysis of a North–South science collaboration. Africa Today. 2023;69(4):53-76. doi: 10.2979/africatoday.69.4.03.
12. Reinertsen AB, Stien KE, Merzliakova E, Chernik V, Afonkina J, Zoglowek H, Kuzmicheva TV. Border rioting and crossings between disciplines and professions, countries and cultures, science and society: An assemblage of autoethnographic stories from the High North. Qualitative Inquiry. 2023;29(7):814-824. doi: 10.1177/10778004221142811.
13. Gregory FR. Surviving departmental toxicity: An autoethnographic reflection of navigating gendered and racialized violence in environmental science, policy, and management. Women, Gender, and Families of Color. 2020;8(2):126-133. doi: 10.5406/womgenfamcol.8.2.0126.
14. Le Roux DB. Ten years in the trenches of a doubtful science: An autoethnographic investigation of five challenges of teaching in information systems. In Communications in Computer and Information Science Springer. 2022;1461:118-131. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-95003-3_8.
15. Yap CK. A reflection on Mount Tsukuba visit: A journey of elevation, ethics, and ecology. Biodiversity. 2025. doi: 10.31031/BOJ.2025.05.000616.
16. Valle GR. Narratives of place: Critical reflections on place-making in the curriculum of Environmental Studies and Sciences (ESS). Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 2021;11(1):130-138. doi: 10.1007/s13412-020-00598-6
17. Goff LL, Blot F, Peltier A, Laffont L, Becerra S, Ruiz CH, Abarzua JQ, Philippe M, Paegelow M, Menjot L, Delplace G, Schreck E. From uncertainty to environmental impacts: Reflection on the threats to water in Chacabuco Province (Chile): A combined approach in social sciences and geochemistry. Sustainability Science. 2022;17(5):2113-2131. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01127-w.
18. Yap CK. Mussels, memory, and the recorders of the coast: A reflective note on heavy metals, coastal pollution, and planetary health. Journal of Life Science Systems and Technology. 2025;1(1):1-6.
19. Yap CK. Perna viridis as a coastal sentinel for hydrology and education: A reflective and conceptual synthesis. International Journal of Hydrology. 2025;9(2):80-83. doi: 10.15406/ijh.2025.09.00406.
20. Yap CK. Air termenung (still water) after the storm: A cracked court, resilient plants, and lessons for life. International Journal of Hydro. 2025;9(4):148-151. doi: 10.15406/ijh.2025.09.00414.
21. Yap CK. Where the flame endures: Passion, mentorship, and writing rooted in basic ecological research. MOJ Biology and Medicine. 2025;10(2):76-78. doi: 10.15406/mojbm.2025.10.00245.
22. Parker S. Reflections on an environmental science project for primary schools in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Educational Development. 1984;4(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/0738-0593(84)90029-4.
23. Pelfonen A. Reflections of STS discussions in the reform of Finnish “environmental-science” education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education.1997;6(1):27-40. doi: 10.1080/10382046.1997.9965021.
24. Yap CK. Writing from the heart, working with the clock: A practical system for steady academic papers based on my personal experience. Recent Progress in Science. 2025;2:014. doi: 10.70462/rps.2025.2.014.
25. Yap CK. The silent WhatsApp messages: From disappointment to the joy of reconnection through small responses. Social Values and Society. 2025;7(2):96-98.
26. Yap CK. The basic is still basic: A biology professor’s philosophy and personal reflection. I Tech Mag. 2025;7:79-82.
27. Elias D, Elaez A, Funoy Sayar M, Lynch C, Martin L, Minchew K, Ramirez J, Rizzo A, van Norden C. Integrating communication, reflection, and real-world relevance in undergraduate science through scaffolded case studies in environmental health. Journal of College Science Teaching. doi: 10.1080/0047231X.2025.2557989.
28. Tirados RMG, Maura VG. Educational quality as perceived by the actors involved: Reflections based on a study in the environmental sciences course. Service Business.  2010;4(2):137-154. doi: 10.1007/s11628-009-0091-5.
29. Yap CK. The unseen foundations: Reflections on basic research, student growth, and the role of personality in learning. Education. Sustainability & Society. 2025;8(1):45-46.
30. McGranahan DA, Fernando FN, Kirkwood MLE. Reflections on a boom: Perceptions of energy development impacts in the Bakken oil patch inform environmental science & policy priorities. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;599-600:1993-2018. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.122. Epub 2017 May 23. PMID: 28558422.
31. Wang X, Huang M, Shao H, Li K, Zhai X.  Ethical reflection of Chinese scientists on the dual-use concerns of emerging medical biotechnology. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2025;51(10):662-667. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-110404.
32. Lozano-Cabedo C, Moreno M, Díaz-Méndez C, Ajates R, Navas-Martín MÁ. Scientists’ views on sustainable healthy diets: A reflection process towards a multi-disciplinary consensus. Sustainability. 2025;17(10):4542. doi: 10.3390/su17104542.
33. Lindley ED, Westley PAH. Methods and approach to the interdisciplinary and cross-cultural Arctic Alaska Salmon Workshop: Critical self-reflections from fisheries scientists. Arctic Science. doi: 10.1139/as-2023-0054.
34. Nowack RL. Science and reflections: With some thoughts to young applied scientists and engineers. Earthquake Science. 2024;37(5):459-493. doi: 10.1016/j.eqs.2024.06.004.
35. Bruce CD, DuBose LE, Tremblay JC, Oliveira B, Islam H, Teixeira AL, Brewster LM, Meah, VL, Tymko MM. Creating your own line: Reflections from early career scientists. Advances in Physiology Education. 2024;48(1):49-60. doi: 10.1152/advan.00202.2023.
36. Strandberg M. The unlimited benefits of work-integrated learning: Reflections, shifts, and other transformations by an educational leader, improvement scientist, and math pun enthusiast. In Educators’ work integrated learning experiences. Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-65964-5_14.
37. Johnson CL, Friedman DB, Ingram LA, Ford ME, McCrary-Quarles A, Dye CJ, Miller MC, Ariyo O, Bagasra O, Chen H, McCollum Q, Levkoff SE. Reflections on Mentorship From Scientists and Mentors in an Alzheimer's Disease Focused Research Training Program. J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Nov;41(11):2307-2315. doi: 10.1177/07334648221109514. Epub 2022 Jun 29. PMID: 35766623; PMCID: PMC9561042.
38. Koch C. Reflections of a natural scientist on panpsychism. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2021;28(9-10):65-75. doi: 10.53765/20512201.28.9.065.
39. Darwin AD. The development and future of occupational science: A budding occupational scientist’s reflections and assertions about the discipline. Journal of Occupational Science. 2021;28(2):193-207. doi: 10.1080/14427591.2020.1801492.
40. Merad M. Reflections from a mother scientist. Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1316. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1052-8. PMID: 32839622.
41. Estuar MRJE, Uyheng J, de Leon MM, Benito DJ, Lara-Tuprio ED, Estadilla CDS, Teng TRY. Science and public service during a pandemic: Reflections from the scientists of the Philippine government’s COVID-19 surveillance platform. Philippine Studies: Historical and Ethnographic Viewpoints. 2020;68(3-4):493-504. doi: 10.13185/2244-1638.1061
42. Neilson AL. Expanding socioecological justice through photo narratives: An autoethnography of a researcher collaborating with Azorean fishing communities. Environmental Science & Policy. 2025;168:104075. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104075
43. Uekusa S, Nguyen-Trung K, Lorenz DF, Michael S, Karki J. Bourdieu and Early Career Researchers (ECRs) in disaster research: A Collaborative Autoethnography (CAE). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2024;114:104969. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104969.
44. Chen C. Situated researcher: A critical autoethnography on migrant researcher’s mobility, positionality, and agency / Situated researcher: A critical autoethnography on the mobility, positionality, and agency of migrant researchers. Belgeo.  doi: 10.4000/belgeo.66217.
45. Kreher S, Seifert E. Researching, teaching and learning from and through autoethnography in nursing and health sciences.  doi: 10.4324/9781032708614-4.
46. Haeffner M, Hames F, Barbour MM, Reeves JM, Platell G, Grover S. Expanding collaborative autoethnography into the world of natural science for transdisciplinary teams. One Earth. 2022 Feb 18;5(2):157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.01.002. PMID: 36569281; PMCID: PMC9767446.
47. Kim WJ. Critical autoethnography: A Korean science teacher’s consciousness analysis. In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL). 2020;4:2245-2248
48. O'Hara S. Autoethnography: The Science of Writing Your Lived Experience. HERD. 2018 Oct;11(4):14-17. doi: 10.1177/1937586718801425. Epub 2018 Oct 18. PMID: 30336695.