Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in United States (US) Veterans and to healthcare costs in the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. Optimizing Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) can improve Veteran health, reduce incidence of cardiovascular events and death, and lower healthcare costs.
Methods: The VA Lipid Optimization Reimagined - Quality Improvement (VALOR-QI) program is an innovative three-year multi-site quality improvement program leveraging various lipid optimization strategies tailored to unique barriers and needs at 50 VA Medical Centers. Program oversight is provided by the Boston VA Coordinating Center and the American Heart Association (AHA), and local teams include a site lead or Clinical Champion (CC), a Healthcare Coach (HC), and a Health Care Provider Network (HCPN) of clinicians treating Veterans with ASCVD. Outcome data are collected through the VA electronic health record database and QI data are collected through the VA Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system. Primary and secondary outcomes include the percentage of Veterans with optimized LDL-C (<70 mg/dL), absolute and percent change in LDL-C, use of lipid lowering therapies, medication adherence, cardiovascular risk score, and healthcare utilization and costs. Lipid optimization outcomes will be stratified by key Veteran demographics including geographic region, age, sex assigned at birth, race, and ethnicity.
Results: N/A- Program still in progress.
Conclusions: We will assess whether a novel quality improvement program can optimize lipids in Veterans with ASCVD at high risk for cardiovascular events, with subsequent improvement of Veterans’ health and reduction of costs for US Veterans and the VA Healthcare System. Findings from this program can inform clinical processes and guidelines for the VA Healthcare System and other healthcare systems alike.
ACC: American College of Cardiology; AHA: American Heart Association; ASCVD: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease; BCC: VA Boston Coordinating Center; CC(s): Clinical Champion(s); CDW: VA Corporate Data Warehouse; CV: Cardiovascular; DoD: Department of Defense; HC(s): Healthcare Coach(es); HCP(s): Healthcare Providers(s); HCPN: Health Care Provider Network; LDL-C: Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LLT(s): Lipid Lowering Therapy(ies); Non-HDL-C: Non- High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; NPC: Non- Profit Corporation; PHI: Protected Health Information; PII: Personally Identifiable Information; QI: Quality Improvement; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture; US: United States; VA: United States Department of Veterans Affairs; VALOR-QI: Veterans Affairs Lipid Optimization Reimagined - Quality Improvement Program; VAMC: Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in United States (US) Veterans and to healthcare costs in the US Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System [1,2]. Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) is an established major risk factor for cardiovascular events and management of LDL-C is an effective prevention measure for cardiovascular (CV) events in high-risk individuals, including those with ASCVD [3,4]. Despite the availability of effective Lipid Lowering Therapies (LLTs), approximately two thirds of Veterans with ASCVD in the VA have elevated or suboptimal LDL-C (defined in this program as LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL) [5]. Veterans with ASCVD are at high risk for recurrent CV events and can benefit greatly in the short and long term from lipid optimization and improved LDL-C management [3,5].
Suboptimal LDL-C management in Veterans with ASCVD has been attributed to various factors including lack of awareness, patient preferences, statin intolerance, clinical inertia, poor adherence to LLTs, and the disagreement on lipid treatment goals and management among care teams and in national guidelines [5,6]. Current VA/Department of Defense (DoD) lipid guidelines suggest that the reduction of LDL-C levels below a threshold 100 mg/dL can prevent the occurrence of CV events, even in high-risk groups [3,7,8]. In contrast, the 2018 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol recommends that for high-risk individuals, including those with ASCVD, LDL-C levels be reduced to less than 70 mg/dL for CV event prevention by intensifying statin therapy and using non-statin therapies [3,7,8].
There is a compelling need to address dyslipidemia management, education, and guidelines to improve the cardiovascular health of Veterans with ASCVD and suboptimal LDL-C levels. Quality Improvement (QI) projects play an integral role in the VA Healthcare System; they provide the opportunity to assess barriers to care, identify care solutions, and collaborate with experts, staff, and Veterans to implement sustainable, system wide care improvements. Since a large proportion of Veterans with ASCVD have elevated LDL-C levels, the VA in collaboration with AHA, developed a novel QI program to optimize lipid management for Veterans most at risk of CV events and to reduce CV events and CV-related costs for the VA Healthcare System [5].
The VA Lipid Optimization Reimagined - Quality Improvement (VALOR-QI) program aims to improve clinical pathways and processes that impact the lipid management of Veterans with ASCVD through multifaceted strategies that target four key objectives (Table 1).
| Table 1: Program objectives for VALOR-QI. |
| VALOR-QI Program Objectives |
| Development of an algorithm to identify at-risk Veterans with ASCVD who are suitable for participation in lipid optimization interventions. Assessment of potential barriers to lipid management among Veterans, HCPs treating Veterans with ASCVD, and the VA Healthcare System. Development of a comprehensive assessment of care plans to identify potential barriers to optimizing lipid management for Veterans engaged in the program. Evaluation of the efficacy and long-term safety of various delivery of care models for the management of dyslipidemia, including use of statin and non-statin LLTs, HC interventions, and HCP process and procedure changes. |
| ASCVD indicates Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease; HCPs, Healthcare Providers; VA, Veterans Affairs; LLTs, Lipid Lowering Therapies; and HC, Healthcare Coach. |
VALOR-QI is an innovative, collaborative three-year multi-site QI program established by the VA and the American Heart Association (AHA). Local VALOR-QI teams at 50 VA Medical Centers (VAMC) will develop and deploy a variety of QI interventions that address site-specific barriers to Veteran lipid optimization.
VAMC eligibility criteria: A VAMC is eligible for participation in VALOR-QI if it: 1) has an associated Non-Profit Corporation (NPC) to accept funding according to VA third-party funding requirements; 2) has identified a local site lead to serve as Clinical Champion (CC), a Healthcare Coach (HC), and clinical staff to implement the program as the Health Care Provider Network (HCPN); and 3) serves a Veteran population eligible for VALOR-QI that is representative of the diverse nature of US Veterans in factors such as rurality, race, ethnicity, sex assigned at birth, age, social determinants of health, and severity of ASCVD/LDL-C levels (Table 2).
| Table 2: VA Medical Center and Veteran inclusion and exclusion criteria for participation in VALOR-QI. | ||
| VA Medical Center | Veteran | |
| Inclusion Criteria | Has associated NPC CC and HC identified Serves population of eligible Veterans | Age ≥ 18 Diagnosis of ASCVD LDL- C ≥ 70mg/dL or non-HDL- C ≥ 100 mg/dL Seen by member of HCPN member |
| Exclusion Criteria | No ability to receive third-party funding No staff to fulfill critical roles Does not treat populaticon of eligible and diverse Veterans | HCP clinical decision to not engage Veteran Recent CV event that could interfere with acute management |
| NPC indicates Non-Profit Corporation; CC, Clinical Champion; HC, Healthcare Coach; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Non-HDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HCPN, Health Care Provider Network; HCPs, Healthcare Providers; and CV, cardiovascular. | ||
Veteran eligibility criteria: Veterans must meet the following criteria to be eligible for participation in the VALOR-QI program: 1) over the age of 18 with a history of ASCVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease); 2) have either LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL; and 3) be treated by a member of the HCPN. Exclusion criteria for the program include 1) responsible HCP clinical decision to not engage Veteran and 2) Veterans with recent CV events that according to HCP might interfere with acute management (Table 2).
The VALOR-QI National Network consists of program oversight provided by the AHA QI Consulting Team and the VA Boston Coordinating Center (BCC), and 50 local site VAMC teams made up of CCs, HCs, a HCPN, and an affiliated NPC (Figure 1).
Program oversight: VALOR-QI program administration consists of two entities working together to ensure program goals and objectives are met: the AHA QI Consulting Team and the BCC.
QI support & facilitation activities: The BCC and AHA teams provide monitoring, support the implementation of QI processes and strategies, and generate program-related resources for participating VALOR-QI sites. Although most program oversight activities span both teams, some roles are unique to each (Figure 2).
VALOR-QI Local Sites: Each participating site includes a CC who is responsible for local site oversight and activities; an HC who is responsible for engaging eligible Veterans and HCPs; an HCPN consisting of providers who treat eligible Veterans and support the implementation of process and procedure changes to optimize lipid management; and an NPC that is responsible for site contracting, staffing, and payments.
| Table 3: Direct and Indirect Quality Improvement (QI) Activities Deployed at Local VALOR-QI sites. | ||
| Direct Veteran Engagement Activities | Indirect Veteran Engagement Activities | |
| Definition | QI activities that take place between an HC and Veteran who has been enrolled in the direct cohort of the program. | QI activities that do not include any interaction between an HC and a directly engaged Veteran. Typically, indirect QI strategies include the local site VALOR-QI team addressing clinical processes and procedures. |
| Program Data | Directly engaged Veterans are entered into the VA REDCap database and their activities are collected in VA REDCap for the course of the program. Outcomes are monitored via electronic health record review. | Summary-level data on implementation strategies are documented during AHA QI Consulting Meetings and outcomes are monitored via electronic health record review of eligible Veterans who interact with the local site VALOR-QI team. |
| Examples | In-person meeting between HC and Veteran to discuss lifestyle management goals Phone calls between HC and Veteran to review importance of medication adherence Group classes for HC and Veterans to share lipid management journeys and challenges Notifying Veterans that they have reached LDL-C goals | Establishing a lipid clinic to streamline lipid management at a local VAMC Ordering labs for Veterans who have not had them drawn in over a year Sending HCPN appointment reminders and lipid management recommendations for Veterans with suboptimal LDL-C levels Collaborating with other local VAMC entities such as MOVE!® Weight Management Program, Whole Health, Smoking Cessation, and Pharmacy to leverage local site resources and monitor care plan |
| QI indicates quality improvement; HC: Healthcare Coach; VA: United States Department of Veterans Affairs; VA REDCap, VA Research Electronic Data Capture; AHA, American Heart Association; LDL-C, Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; VAMC, Veterans Affairs Medical Center; and HCPN, Health Care Provider Network. | ||
The primary clinical outcomes of this program are to increase the percentage of Veterans achieving LDL-C target of less than 70 mg/dL to over 30% and to demonstrate a meaningful change in LDL-C in Veterans with ASCVD not at target LDL-C at baseline.
Secondary outcomes include absolute and percent change in LDL-C, use of LLTs, medication adherence, and healthcare utilization and costs. Lipid optimization outcomes will be evaluated stratified by key Veteran demographics including geographic region, age, assigned sex, race, and ethnicity.
The AHA and BCC teams will develop benchmarks to evaluate program implementation. Metrics will be used to evaluate local- and national-level outcomes at 6 and 12 month intervals. Summary assessment data will be shared with local sites and VALOR-QI leadership on an ongoing basis.
At the completion of the program, analyses will be conducted to determine the overall impact of VALOR-QI on lipid optimization. The BCC will also evaluate cost-effectiveness and healthcare resource utilization associated with the overarching QI program (Table 4).
| Table 4: VALOR-QI data sources and management. | ||||
| Description | Data Collected | Security & Management | Quality Control | |
| VA CDW | Data warehouse that contains electronic health record data for all Veterans receiving care in the VA Healthcare System. | Veteran demographics, LDL-C labs, LLT data, ASCVD and CV disease diagnoses and events, appointments, and healthcare costs and utilization | Data can only be accessed by BCC staff post-training and approval. CDW data are stored on secure VA servers behind the VA firewall. Personnel that are no longer part of the program have their accesses removed immediately upon notification of departure. | CDW’s Data Quality Team ensures data are accurately extracted into the warehouse. Subject matter experts ensure data integration, architecture, and source management. Data quality reviews are conducted daily12 |
| VA REDCap | Secure, web-based database used to enter directly engaged Veterans and their HC interactions. | Veteran identifying information, Veteran demographics, engagement and withdrawal dates, HC interaction dates and types | VA REDCap can only be accessed by BCC and local site staff post-training and approval. Access is limited to the VA server using staff credentials. Personnel that are no longer part of the program have their accesses removed immediately upon notification of departure. | Site entered data are audited on a quarterly basis by the BCC for completeness and accuracy of certain variables. |
| Survey and Consultations | Site-level qualitative and quantitative program data are collected throughout the program via surveys and during consultations. | Quantities of HC activities, adherence to QI activities, changes in clinical processes and procedures, local site satisfaction and feedback, and program sustainability goals | Data from surveys and consultations can only be viewed by BCC and/or AHA QI Consulting Team staff depending on the sensitivity of data collected. Aggregate data are shared with program leadership and sites on an as needed basis. | Survey responses are reviewed for correctness and completeness. Response rates for surveys are monitored and follow up is completed on an as-needed basis to ensure representative site participation. AHA QI consultants document strategies using a tracking document on a quarterly basis. |
| VA indicated United States Department of Veterans Affairs; VA CDW, VA Corporate Data Warehouse; LDL-C, Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LLT, Lipid Lowering Therapy; ASCVD, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease; CV, Cardiovascular; BCC, Boston Coordinating Center; VA REDCap, VA Research Electronic Data Capture; HC, Healthcare Coach; QI, Quality Improvement; and AHA, American Heart Association. | ||||
Clinical outcome data will be extracted from three main sources: (1) the electronic VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) for indirect Veteran information and all Veteran outcome data, (2) data received from sites via self-report on site QI activities with directly engaged Veterans in VA REDCap databases, and (3) information gathered from VALOR-QI sites during their consultations throughout the program to document insights on local site program activities, experiences, and satisfaction with the VALOR-QI Program (Table 4).
All Protected Health Information (PHI), Personally Identifiable Information (PII), and sensitive program data are collected and securely stored behind the VA firewall by the BCC and participating sites via VA approved data storage strategies (Table 4). No individual-level data are shared with the AHA, NPCs, or outside of the appropriate local site teams.
Participating sites and BCC team members protect Veteran PHI and PII by encrypting communication with key program entities, implementing access restrictions, and securing paper records. Violations of established data protection measures are documented, reported, and addressed in accordance with VA guidelines.
VA REDCap data are audited on a quarterly basis by the BCC. CDW data are reviewed to ensure the accuracy of cohort information, and the codes used to analyze these data are reviewed by a data analyst or epidemiologist with extensive experience working with VA data and trained in code review (Table 4).
As both the first ASCVD-focused initiative of its kind and one of the largest known multi-site QI networks in the VA Healthcare System, VALOR-QI presents a critical opportunity for VAMCs to meaningfully impact clinical culture, LDL-C guidelines, and lipid management practices. This initiative aligns with the VA Healthcare System’s commitment to providing Veterans with high quality, holistic, and patient-centered cardiovascular healthcare.
VALOR-QI's dynamic design fosters continuous assessment, adaptation, and refinement of QI strategies deployed at each site, highlighting the program’s unique strengths. By prioritizing flexibility, agility, and sustainability, sites are encouraged to make ongoing adjustments to their local QI plans to address ever-changing barriers and needs. QI strategies are implemented at multiple levels of the VA Healthcare System, and include Veteran-focused healthcare coaching, provider education and trainings, as well as clinical and operational changes. Rich variation in geographic location, VAMC size, Veteran populations served, and staff clinical background among VALOR-QI sites has resulted in a strong network that underscores the considerable breadth and depth of expertise within the VA Healthcare System.
Several areas for overall program improvement have been identified, particularly surrounding site selection and data collection processes. Due to administrative requirements, only those VA locations with a designated NPC were eligible for selection, thus limiting the pool of potentially eligible sites. Program data, self-reported in REDCap and recorded in the VA CDW, are also prone to bias and misclassification. These limitations represent key areas of opportunity for future expansion on this work.
Subsequent VALOR-QI activities include comprehensive outcome analyses that will evaluate the program’s efficacy in optimizing Veteran lipid levels and reducing the economic cost and utilization associated with ASCVD care at VAMCs. Results from these analyses will inform the refinement of best practices for ASCVD management, clinical workflows, Veteran and provider education, and strategies for incorporating lipid-centric health coaching into care models. Ultimately, participating VA leadership, staff, and collaborators are committed to leveraging program findings to sustain and expand upon these impactful activities and initiatives, thereby elevating the standard of care for Veterans with ASCVD within and beyond the VA Healthcare System.
We would like to thank the Veterans and all VALOR-QI team members at our 50 participating sites without whom this work would not be possible. We would also like to thank Melissa Young, a subject matter expert from the VA Boston Healthcare System for her contributions to this work and the VALOR-QI Program.
The VALOR-QI program is supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
The contents of this paper do not represent the views of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. J.M.G received investigator-initiated funding from Novartis for a different ongoing project. Other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
SignUp to our
Content alerts.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Are you the author of a recent Preprint? We invite you to submit your manuscript for peer-reviewed publication in our open access journal.
Benefit from fast review, global visibility, and exclusive APC discounts.